splicing entrance conductors

Status
Not open for further replies.

keith gigabyte

Senior Member
An inspector failed a job to reintroduce power to a home that utility had shut off for 2 years. All looked good except the neutral had been spliced in panel box. It had cadmium split bolt and proper size wire. Inspector said can't splice entrance conductors I cited 230.46 splicing entrance conductors. He said that refers to trough mounted blocks feeding multiple panels..ie 300 amp service with two 150 amp panels. Those are taps from my point of view. How would you handle it?
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
The inspector is incorrect.

Ask him to reconsider.

If he does not change his mind, go over his head if he has an electrically-knowledgeable superior. Otherwise, your best course will likely be to replace the SE.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
He said that refers to trough mounted blocks feeding multiple panels..ie 300 amp service with two 150 amp panels. Those are taps from my point of view. How would you handle it?
Ask him where it states such install must be mounted blocks.

If you want to call it a tap, fine. In your install you have a tap situation with one incoming and one outgoing conductor. Tell him you could splice the ungrounded conductors if it makes him feel better about it - though it won't really change all that much.
 

keith gigabyte

Senior Member
Pretty much what I thought thanks guys. But some other info. I didn't wite the joint i do work for a real estate company and they gave me task of getting power back on and I don't fix anything unless it needs it

at at least I know I'm not crazy
 

iwire

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Massachusetts
Sure and when he sees this:



he will be most cooperative.:D

Besides the fact there is no code section saying we can't splice service conductors the inspector was shown a code section explicitly allowing service conductors to be spliced I am fine with my response. :cool:
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
Besides the fact there is no code section saying we can't splice service conductors the inspector was shown a code section explicitly allowing service conductors to be spliced I am fine with my response. :cool:
Most of us agree with what you said (both times), but outside the inspector seeing that several think he is wrong, it may not even begin to change his opinion here.
 

kwired

Electron manager
Location
NE Nebraska
These are not taps IMO. It is a splice because the wire size is the same. A tap conductor is reduced in size and must follow the rules of Article 240.
NEC doesn't have a definition for the word "tap". You can have taps that are outside the scope of art 240.21(B).

What is covered by 240.21(B) is what the NEC refers to as "feeder taps", though it does't actually have a definition in 240 or in art 100, so the term "feeder tap" sort of only applies when using 240.21(B).
 

Smart $

Esteemed Member
Location
Ohio
These are not taps IMO. It is a splice because the wire size is the same. A tap conductor is reduced in size and must follow the rules of Article 240.
Not so for service entrance conductors. Following the requirements of Article 230 will result in an installation quite similar.
 

meternerd

Senior Member
Location
Athol, ID
Occupation
retired water & electric utility electrician, meter/relay tech
I wonder if the inspector has ever looked up at a weatherhead. How would he think we, as a POCO, go from our service drop to the customer's riser conductors. Splices...they are usually insulinks or side by side one-bolt or two-bolt clamps. Goes to different size wire, aluminum to copper, etc. Weird.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top