User Tag List

Page 126 of 126 FirstFirst ... 26 76 116 124 125 126
Results 1,251 to 1,259 of 1259

Thread: May I ask a question about the single vs two phase stuff

  1. #1251
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Springfield, MA, USA
    Posts
    3,428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Carultch View Post
    It is called single phase, because it is most commonly produced from a single phase of a three phase system. It is center-tapped on the transformer secondary to produce equal and opposite line voltages, relative to neutral.

    Assuming ideal waveforms, it happens to be mathematically equivalent to a hypothetical system made from two separate phases, that would be 180 degrees out of phase. But this doesn't represent how it is supplied in practice, so that is why it isn't called "two phase".
    Plausible. Though I think that it may have more to do with how the service is used than how it is derived. Consider that the following are all called 'single phase':

    1) two hot legs 180 degrees out of phase supplied by a single core transformer with a center tap
    2) two hot legs 120 degrees out of phase 'derived' from a three phase wye service in multi-occupancy residential situations
    3) two hot legs 180 degrees out of phase supplied by a generator connected 'double delta' to make best use of all of the generator windings when supplying single phase loads.

    -Jon

  2. #1252
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by winnie View Post
    Plausible. Though I think that it may have more to do with how the service is used than how it is derived. Consider that the following are all called 'single phase':

    1) two hot legs 180 degrees out of phase supplied by a single core transformer with a center tap
    2) two hot legs 120 degrees out of phase 'derived' from a three phase wye service in multi-occupancy residential situations
    3) two hot legs 180 degrees out of phase supplied by a generator connected 'double delta' to make best use of all of the generator windings when supplying single phase loads.

    -Jon
    That 'out of phase' phrase is also just colloquial though. A lot of us think it suggests that the sum of the voltages would be zero and not 240. That's the reason for thousands of posts, perhaps even more that the number of phases. On a high leg delta, are the 120V waveforms 'out of phase'? That seems wrong to us intuitively when considering it as a three phase supply. And it's not because we don't know the math.

  3. #1253
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jaggedben View Post
    A lot of us think it suggests that the sum of the voltages would be zero and not 240
    So with that logic you would think that the two 120 volt phases on a 120/208 system yield 120 volts instead of 208 volts.
    BB+/BB=?

  4. #1254
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by winnie View Post
    I know my thinking on this subject has changed over the course of the thread(s).

    I started in the camp of 'it is a single phase' and that is why we call it 'single phase'.

    I've shifted to 'there are clearly two discernible phases present', but it is still a 'single phase' supply because that is the naming convention.

    -Jon
    Was it the 2 diode full wave bridge? Seems like I remember a comment to that effect but I'm not positive if that was you way back then.
    BB+/BB=?

  5. #1255
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    24,282
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mivey View Post
    So with that logic you would think that the two 120 volt phases on a 120/208 system yield 120 volts instead of 208 volts.
    No, because there genuinely IS a phase shift between the two 120v waves, which are derived from more than a single-phase primary.
    Code references based on 2005 NEC
    Larry B. Fine
    Master Electrician
    Electrical Contractor
    Richmond, VA

  6. #1256
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by ggunn View Post
    Also, there is a single phase across the terminals of the center tapped transformer; it only looks like two phases because a reference point is chosen between the terminals. I think I'm the first person to say that in this thread... NOT!
    There is a single phase with any two terminals, by definition. The two end terminals of a 120/208 only have one 208 volt signal.

    To get a 3rd phase from an open wye-wye bank you have to recognize the other half of the winding is 180 degrees out of phase. If you do not recognize that difference, you will think you have 0d, 120d, and 60d voltages instead of what you really get which are 0d, 120d, and 240d voltages.
    BB+/BB=?

  7. #1257
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    9,642
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by LarryFine View Post
    No, because there genuinely IS a phase shift between the two 120v waves, which are derived from more than a single-phase primary.
    If you use the same erroneous logic proposed you will get the same erroneous conclusion I stated. It's a math error that I was pointing out, nothing to do with the rest of the debate.
    BB+/BB=?

  8. #1258
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mivey View Post
    So with that logic you would think that the two 120 volt phases on a 120/208 system yield 120 volts instead of 208 volts.
    No, you're mischaracterizing. Like I said, it's not because we don't understand the math.

  9. #1259
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The 'logic' applies only to a 180deg phase shift that becomes a 0deg phase shift when references are reversed (or vice versa!). Since the math doesn't produce that result with any other phase shift, it doesn't apply to any other phase shift value.

    Also, it wasn't a claim about logic. It was a claim about semantics.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •