User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: NEC short circuit calculations

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,108
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    NEC short circuit calculations

    Using page 7 and onward as a reference, are the short circuit calculations shown accurate enough for breaker AIC sizing purposes? If so, how much do they deviate from symmetrical components and X and R calculations? Will they ever produce values below a "real" short circuit calculation?


    What about 3 phase grounded wye?



    Also why don't molded case breakers list the X/R ratio they base their fault current on? Is there ever a time when the X/R ratio of a 600 volt and under scenario will exceed that of the breaker?


    For the sake of the discussion lets assume the POCO transformer primary is an infinite source.







    https://www.scribd.com/document/3520...it-Calculation

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,108
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Here is the Mike Holt paper those equations are derived from:



    https://www.mikeholt.com/files/PDF/S...atons_Book.pdf


    It looks to simple vs a symmetrical calculation.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think we discussed about this in this thread:
    Thread: Adding Z of transformers and wiring and X/R ratios of 19 March 2019

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Vermont
    Posts
    2,476
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    iirc, someone posted a free arc calulator here in the past, which i lost...can anyone update that here?

    ~RJ~

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,108
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Right View Post
    I think we discussed about this in this thread:
    Thread: Adding Z of transformers and wiring and X/R ratios of 19 March 2019
    Missed it, I need a link.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    NE Nebraska
    Posts
    41,295
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by romex jockey View Post
    iirc, someone posted a free arc calulator here in the past, which i lost...can anyone update that here?

    ~RJ~
    Look in free stuff on Mike Holt's main website.
    I live for today, I'm just a day behind.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mbrooke View Post
    Missed it, I need a link.
    https://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=197322

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,108
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Right View Post
    But it doesn't answer all that well how far those equations stray from the symmetrical component analysis and if they can ever produce values below "classical" equations.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    9,108
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Also, how were these values derived? Are the conductors twisted? Pulled flat? Worse case? Average?




  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    604
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If we are speaking about Point-To-Point Method Of Short-Circuit Calculation Cooper-Bussmann pg.7 then up to point 3 [including Notes 1 to 6] I agree with.
    I don't like to use the transformer data table. Usually the impedance is less than known.
    The factor f system it can be discussed. The C factor is calculated using IEEE 241/1990 pg.320 Table 65 Approximate Impedance Data Insulated Conductors 60 Hz.
    Let's take 5 cables from the table:
    1/0,2/0,4/0,500 mcm and 1000 mcm and let's compare with NEC 2017 Table 9, and Okonite catalogue.
    First, the conductor resistance is less than "correct" calculated since factors as temperature, skin effect and proximity effect are neglected. The reactance is also less than other sources [NEC, Manufacturer]. However, recalculated the examples from page 7 using "correct" parameters from NEC 2017 Table 9 I got these results:
    System A point F1 “correct” Isc1=49611A ,page 7=49803
    System A point F2 “correct” Isc2= 33531A ,page 7= 35445
    System B point F1 “correct” Isc1= 33088A ,page 7= 33215
    System B point F2 “correct” Isc2= 30715A ,page 7= 30059
    System B point F3 “correct” Isc3= 30299A ,page 7= 29731
    The difference between “correct” and the way using C constant it is only 6% maximum.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •