User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: TIA for 210.52(C)(2)

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    34,753
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    TIA for 210.52(C)(2)

    I just noticed a proposed TIA for 210.52. I thought this may be of interest to all.. Please comment

    210.52(C)(2) Island and Peninsular Countertops and Work SPurfaces. Receptacle outlets
    shall be installed in accordance with 210.52(C)(2)(a) and (C)(2)(b).
    (a) At least one receptacle shall be provided for the first 0.84 m2 (9 ft2), or fraction thereof, of
    the countertop or work surface. A receptacle outlet shall be provided for every additional
    1.7 m2 (18 ft2), or fraction thereof, of the countertop or work surface.
    (b) At least one receptacle outlet shall be located within 600 mm (2 ft) of the outer end of a
    peninsular countertop or work surface. Additional required receptacle outlets shall be
    permitted to be located as determined by the installer, designer, or building owner. The
    location of the receptacle outlets shall be in accordance with 210.52(C)(3).
    A peninsular countertop shall be measured from the connected perpendicular wall.
    They say I shot a man named Gray and took his wife to Italy
    She inherited a million bucks and when she died it came to me
    I can't help it if I'm lucky



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    1,762
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My opinion
    Throw out (a)
    Keep only the first sentence, the reference to 210.52(C)(3) & the last sentence of (b)
    P. S it's late in the day & I'm smelling beer.
    Ron

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    670
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    According to the substantiation, the only thing they did was add the last sentence. It was apparently omitted by mistake in the first two drafts. The rest of it was that way through the whole process.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    34,753
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by packersparky View Post
    According to the substantiation, the only thing they did was add the last sentence. It was apparently omitted by mistake in the first two drafts. The rest of it was that way through the whole process.

    That is correct but I had missed the first drafts on this
    They say I shot a man named Gray and took his wife to Italy
    She inherited a million bucks and when she died it came to me
    I can't help it if I'm lucky



  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    27,389
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Do you have the prior wording for comparison?
    Rob

    Moderator

    All responses based on the 2014 NEC unless otherwise noted

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Chapel Hill, NC
    Posts
    34,753
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by infinity View Post
    Do you have the prior wording for comparison?
    The original proposal was the same as above without the last sentence and obviously the previous wording to that is in the nec 2017

    Not sure if that answers your question
    They say I shot a man named Gray and took his wife to Italy
    She inherited a million bucks and when she died it came to me
    I can't help it if I'm lucky



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •