tonyi
Senior Member
This is a thought experiment I've been pondering.
Imagine load calcs for a couple of BRs indicated that the pair of them could be served by a single 20A branch. You could run #12 and use one breaker, but this has the disadvantage of taking out both BRs if it tripped, #12 is harder to handle, slower to install, fills boxes quicker, etc.
What would prevent using a single 20A AFCI as a 120V feeder to a 2-slot panel with a pair of ordinary 15A breakers in it? They're listed for feeders as well as branches. Downstream stuff would be protected, and it would wind up cheaper than using a pair of 15A AFCI's on the #14 wire.
[edit: what got me thinking about this are these microscopic sized bedrooms often found in Victorian and turn of the century places where there's room enough for a bed/dresser and not much else. There's really no room for a bunch of high powered stuff in one.]
[ January 03, 2004, 10:43 AM: Message edited by: tonyi ]
Imagine load calcs for a couple of BRs indicated that the pair of them could be served by a single 20A branch. You could run #12 and use one breaker, but this has the disadvantage of taking out both BRs if it tripped, #12 is harder to handle, slower to install, fills boxes quicker, etc.
What would prevent using a single 20A AFCI as a 120V feeder to a 2-slot panel with a pair of ordinary 15A breakers in it? They're listed for feeders as well as branches. Downstream stuff would be protected, and it would wind up cheaper than using a pair of 15A AFCI's on the #14 wire.
[edit: what got me thinking about this are these microscopic sized bedrooms often found in Victorian and turn of the century places where there's room enough for a bed/dresser and not much else. There's really no room for a bunch of high powered stuff in one.]
[ January 03, 2004, 10:43 AM: Message edited by: tonyi ]