2" NM Connector in Resi Panel

Status
Not open for further replies.

DanBaLam

Member
Location
Norfolk, VA
Occupation
Electrician
Firstly, Virginia is currently going by the 2014 NEC Code and the 2015 Building Code; and will not adapt the 2017 NEC Code and 2018 Building Codes until July of next year. Or so I've been told.

A new Inspector almost failed an in-wall residential panel change of mine today for using a 2" SER connector to bring several branch circuits into a panel. Said it's not UL Listed for that application. I was not at all sarcastic with him, but it's literally called a non-metallic sheathed cable connector.

Now, I did read through several threads and I saw that folks have described it as lazy and whatnot, but I only do that for the 120V circuits, 20A and less. Everything else goes in it's own plastic NM connectors. I do this, as a means of securing the cables and strain relief.

I always thought that the derating rules only apply on entering an enclosure with a nipple 24" or more. Shorter than that, all is well. Connectors included.

I discussed all this with the inspector and he couldn't cite me a Code reference but what he did say, is that he would accept a chase nipple (or a PVC connector) so long as the cables didn't take up more than 60% of the space. Which honestly, blew my mind even further. No securing of the cables at all, save the staples.

The more I think about it, I wondered what he would want to see coming into the back of an outdoor panel.

I really would like Code references or Code changes I've not yet learned as, of course, we should never stop learning. But this is a super common practice for residential applications in my area and have never had an issue about it until today.

Thanks for any input in advance.
 
Last edited:
What the inspector said will work is a violation in its self. As post #2 said it’s violation of listing to do as you want with the connector. It’s not allowed anymore around here but both of these use to be the norm. I put a splice box under panel and transition to thwn. Dumb not really any benefit but code compliant. If you don’t have a lot of home runs you could just use 3/4 2screw below the buss. If you lay it out right you can put a lot in.
 
Sub-question: Anyone know where you can find what any piece of given material is UL Listed for? Not everything comes with a spec or data sheet and even then, it's sometimes super vague.
 
I really would like Code references or Code changes I've not yet learned as, of course, we should never stop learning. But this is a super common practice for residential applications in my area and have never had an issue about it until today.
From what I've seen on this and other forums this is a common practice that is not code compliant. Inspectors should fail these installations to get the word out that using an SE cable connector for multiple NM cables is not correct.
 
I put a splice box under panel and transition to thwn.
For a panel inside, presumably a box with individual NM connectors and the cables continuing through a nipple into the panel would also work. You'd just need a larger nipple.

For a panel outside, the nipple can't contain NM, so transitioning would be required. If you butt the box against the panel and just use chase nipples, I assume that would be allowed outside?

Cheers, Wayne
 
I believe the inspector is talking about a chase nipple coming out the back of the panel and all the nm cables going thru it. The 60% fill is not accurate, IMO, If it were compliant then you could have 100% fill. He is thinking of note 4 under Table 1 in chapter 9 which pertains to nipples between boxes.

Where conduit or tubing nipples having a maximum
length not to exceed 600 mm (24 in.) are installed
between boxes, cabinets, and similar enclosures, the
nipples shall be permitted to be filled to 60 percent
 
For a panel inside, presumably a box with individual NM connectors and the cables continuing through a nipple into the panel would also work. You'd just need a larger nipple.
For a panel outside, the nipple can't contain NM, so transitioning would be required. If you butt the box against the panel and just use chase nipples, I assume that would be allowed outside?

Cheers, Wayne
i am sorry I did read the op correctly I thought it was an outdoor panel replacement.
 
Those connectors are designed for a cable of specific size not multiple smaller NM cables. The inspector should cite 110.3(B) for the violation.
Example: https://www.gordonelectricsupply.co...wry_RDz6IJMVidJfMiBO-B99nSnIQlaQaAsXrEALw_wcB
The Arlington connectors linked to in this thread are clearly listed for use with multiple smaller NM cables.

http://www.aifittings.com/reference/files/pdf/charts/nm-cable-ranges.pdf

Provided you used an Arlington -brand fitting, I'd argue that you would be code compliant based on the documentation Arlington has provided.


SceneryDriver
 
The Arlington connectors linked to in this thread are clearly listed for use with multiple smaller NM cables.

http://www.aifittings.com/reference/files/pdf/charts/nm-cable-ranges.pdf

Provided you used an Arlington -brand fitting, I'd argue that you would be code compliant based on the documentation Arlington has provided.


SceneryDriver
I'm leaning toward the opinion that some of those numbers are incorrect. It says 10-12/2 cables but only 9-14/2. And this is not a two screw squeeze connector it's one of these. Can you get 10-12/2 cable in there and still crimp it shut?

NM841.jpg
 
I'm leaning toward the opinion that some of those numbers are incorrect. It says 10-12/2 cables but only 9-14/2. And this is not a two screw squeeze connector it's one of these. Can you get 10-12/2 cable in there and still crimp it shut?

NM841.jpg
I agree, and I'm not sure I'd want to try. I was simply stating that according to the directions, I believe you could.

Just because you can, doesn't mean it's a good idea. :)

I wonder if the 2-screw clamps have any similar allowances. I can't find those on Arlington's site right now.



SceneryDriver
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top