realolman said:
You don't have to derate the breaker ...you have to derate the conductors if there are more than three current carrying conductors in the raceway or cable 310.15 B 2.
Yep, derate the conductor not the breaker. . And derate based on number of
ccc, current carrying conductors not
total number of conductors.
480sparky said:
In order to derate any conductor, we must first know what type of insulation is covering it.
True, but it's safe to assume 90?C conductor insulation.
Also assume 75?C lugs. . For SquareD, Seimens, Eaton, GE they rate even their small amp breaker lugs 75?C, "listed and marked otherwise", 110.14(C)(1).
Let's also assume that there's no issue with 240.4(B)(1) [cord + plug branch circuit] and you can use the "
one up" allowance.
With those assumptions, if you put some time into running scenarios of the interaction between 240.4(B), 240.4(D), 240.6(A), T310.15(B)(2)(a), + T310.16 you find out the following:
14gauge can stay on 15amp breakers up to
30ccc.
12gauge can stay on 20amp breakers up to
9ccc.
10gauge can stay on 30amp breakers up to
9ccc.
8gauge can stay on 50amp breakers [except 334.80 + 338.10(B)(4)(a)] up to
3ccc.
8, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1gauge, 4/0, 250, 350, 500, 600 can all stay on their 75?C ampacity up to
3ccc.
1/0, 2/0, 3/0, 300, 400 can all stay on their 75?C ampacity up to
6ccc.
And of course all this changes when you're dealing with aluminum conductors.