Here in NJ the State sets an adoption date and then allows a grace period of 6 months for jobs that may have already been drawn up and bid but haven't started. During the grace period you state on the permit if you're building to the earlier version of the NEC. If you don't make the declaration then your automatically using the currently adopted version. As Roger stated every jurisdiction may be different in their approach.
The owner could say they wanted the project to follow a more current code even if it is not officially the code of the area but, in the case of where a newer code may relax a particular requirement there would be a problem. IMO newer codes don't necessarily mean better requirements or rules. The inspector could only inspect for compliance with the addopted code, anything beyond would be the designer to follow up on.Does this mean the owner has no say in the matter?
dick
Does this mean the owner has no say in the matter?
dick
I've heard it said that our industry isn't "following" 2011 yet and that 2008 is still the code we fall under. Is this true in any way?
At what point in time is an inspector going to be inspecting according to the 2011 NEC?
The owner could say they wanted the project to follow a more current code even if it is not officially the code of the area but, in the case of where a newer code may relax a particular requirement there would be a problem. IMO newer codes don't necessarily mean better requirements or rules. The inspector could only inspect for compliance with the addopted code, anything beyond would be the designer to follow up on.
Roger
Dick, I am not sure how it works where you are but, in most cases the engineer/designer and his/her seal is the main game. The designer will work around the owners desires but the owner has very little say in codes and design (engineering) particulars.That makes sense ,inspection wise but if the designer was working towards an owner's spec then it's on the owner not the designer.like everyone.The engineering company if given total responcibility and the employee(designer) would have a responcibility to do as the engr,co dictated a vicious circle,,still the owner is making final directions in the gray areas in writing and the I would think the inspector would look for compliance to the doc the owner wants and of course would not have any liability status what so ever.
IMO and I say that because I have seen many code exceptions/violations by the owners even during the construction phase.
dick