eric dolphy
Member
- Location
- California
please take a moment to clarify an example given in Annex D8...
the conductor ampacity calculation has a wound-rotor motor, 30hp, 460v, 3 phase, nameplate 38a (primary) and 65a (secondary)...
in determining the proper feeder conductor, the wound-rotor primary value appears to derive from 430.250 is 40 amps (i.e., 30hp @ 460v), but the secondary value appears to derive from the nameplate FLA of 65 amps.
both the 40a and 65 amp figures are then factored @ 125% : 50a and 81a respectively.
1) is all of the above a correct interpretation of D8?
2) are the resulting derived figures then simply added to determine the conductor size without further factoring (310.16)?
thank you
the conductor ampacity calculation has a wound-rotor motor, 30hp, 460v, 3 phase, nameplate 38a (primary) and 65a (secondary)...
in determining the proper feeder conductor, the wound-rotor primary value appears to derive from 430.250 is 40 amps (i.e., 30hp @ 460v), but the secondary value appears to derive from the nameplate FLA of 65 amps.
both the 40a and 65 amp figures are then factored @ 125% : 50a and 81a respectively.
1) is all of the above a correct interpretation of D8?
2) are the resulting derived figures then simply added to determine the conductor size without further factoring (310.16)?
thank you