AC\DC
Senior Member
- Location
- Florence,Oregon,Lane
- Occupation
- EC
We have an amendment to 210.8
Says
Exception to (2),(5),(6),(7),(10): GFCI protection shall not be required for a single receptacle serving an appliance or a duplex receptacle serving two appliances if all of the following conditions are met:
a. The appliance is located within a dedicated space.
b. In normal use the appliance is not easily moved or is fastened in place.
c. The receptacle is labeled as “not GFCI protected.”
Receptacle(s) installed under the exception to 210.8(A)(2), (5), (6), (7), and (10) shall not be considered as meeting the requirements of 210.52(G).
I was in another county on Friday and saw someone out a receptacle behind the washer and tried to meet this requirement.
I never thought about not having the washer not on a gfci.
More I think about it the more it seems to work out.
It’s in a space for a washer machine.
It’s not easily moved.
What do you guys say
Says
Exception to (2),(5),(6),(7),(10): GFCI protection shall not be required for a single receptacle serving an appliance or a duplex receptacle serving two appliances if all of the following conditions are met:
a. The appliance is located within a dedicated space.
b. In normal use the appliance is not easily moved or is fastened in place.
c. The receptacle is labeled as “not GFCI protected.”
Receptacle(s) installed under the exception to 210.8(A)(2), (5), (6), (7), and (10) shall not be considered as meeting the requirements of 210.52(G).
I was in another county on Friday and saw someone out a receptacle behind the washer and tried to meet this requirement.
I never thought about not having the washer not on a gfci.
More I think about it the more it seems to work out.
It’s in a space for a washer machine.
It’s not easily moved.
What do you guys say