What i understand from this section that grounded conductor shall not be smaller than egc for feeder circuit,
The question is: does it also apply for branch circuit?
But it refers to ungrounded conductor not grounding conductor.No, that does not apply to branch circuits.
As far as I know, the only permitted reduction for a branch circuit neutral is in 210.19(A)(3) Ex. No. 2. If there are other permitted reductions, hopefully someone will point them out.
But it refers to ungrounded conductor not grounding conductor.
210 and it's subsections are for branch circuitsWhat i understand from this section that grounded conductor shall not be smaller than egc for feeder circuit,
The question is: does it also apply for branch circuit?
(A)(3) is for ranges and cooking appliances.No, that does not apply to branch circuits.
As far as I know, the only permitted reduction for a branch circuit neutral is in 210.19(A)(3) Ex. No. 2. If there are other permitted reductions, hopefully someone will point them out.
OK, this is your section as you mentioned,As far as I know, the only permitted reduction for a branch circuit neutral is in 210.19(A)(3) Ex. No. 2. If there are other permitted reductions, hopefully someone will point them out.
No it doesn't apply to the neutral and ground on branch circuits. A #6 circuits may have a #6 neutral but the equipment grounding conductor is based on T250.122 which is usually a #10. The neutral however, cannot be smaller than the equipment grounding conductor. Suppose there was a short from a hot conductor to a neutral... If the neutral was smaller than the equipment grounding conductor then it could possibly have too much impedance to trip the breaker.
The code however only allows a reduction for the neutral in the examples mentioned above
Sounds like an answer based on assumptions to me. If it is that important to not be any smaller than the EGC why wasn't it as plainly written many years ago in 210 like it is in 215, or someplace else that would cover both situations?I understand that 215 states that the neutral cannot be smaller than the equipment grounding conductor and I realize that this is not written in 210. You are assuming that the short would happen in a raceway, which it can but not as likely, when it is possible to happen elsewhere.
The only exception I see if for ranges and dryers and those neutrals are sized to be the same as the equipment grounding conductor not smaller. I can only surmise that a smaller neutral would not be allowed even though it is not necessarily written somewhere.
I remember asking this question at one of the big meetings and I can't recall the reasoning but the answer was the neutral cannot be smaller than the equipment grounding conductor for branch circuits.
210.20(B) Conductor Protection. Conductors shall be protected in
accordance with 240.4. Flexible cords and fixture wires shall be
protected in accordance with 240.5.
I addressed that in post 6, some instances I believe you can, isn't all that common to see it but per how code is worded I think you can. 210.19(A)(2) is one situation where it specifically does prohibit it.Okay if I have a 20 amp circuit that has a 15 amp load could you install that with a 14 awg neutral?
Do those sections apply to grounded conductors? Does a 10 AWG feeder neutral of a 60 amp feeder circuit comply with 240.4?Also this
Is a neutral a conductor? I think it applies...Do those sections apply to grounded conductors?
There is a rule for that for feeders (as discussed) based on the load of the neutral...Does a 10 AWG feeder neutral of a 60 amp feeder circuit comply with 240.4?
right and the neutral isn't ordinarily directly protected by an overcurrent device, and in general can not be unless the device simultaneously opens ungrounded conductors as well.Is a neutral a conductor? I think it applies...
There is a rule for that for feeders (as discussed) based on the load of the neutral...
Got to go-- carry on...