Anonymous785463
New member
- Location
- Kansas City, Kansas
Since active equipment is typically not included in the scope of work in design documentation. Is using 220.14 (L)(2), which allows for 180VA per 1 ft. of multi-outlet assemblies acceptable per code?
To be clear about my intent. I was provided an equipment list from the IT team, I know this equipment is not at 100% efficiency. Specifically speaking I feel comfortable taking at least a 80% demand factor on the equipment because I have seen the existing PDU meters showing values for peak demand at around 30%. Since I know the equipment being installed am I required to use 220.14 (A)? I feel showing 220.14 (L)(2) is sufficient in providing enough capacity for the PDU as a whole. What checks and balances does the inspector or plan check really have in enforcing 220.14 (A).
How can I as an engineer use the code to provide a VA that is not extremely excessive. All the meter readings I see end up being between 30-35% of the continuous load per the manufacturer. I feel like I am over engineering every piece of equipment.
Any thoughts or better loopholes to use? Can I take the VA and multiply by the manufacturer's efficiency to get a more accurate VA?
Thanks.
To be clear about my intent. I was provided an equipment list from the IT team, I know this equipment is not at 100% efficiency. Specifically speaking I feel comfortable taking at least a 80% demand factor on the equipment because I have seen the existing PDU meters showing values for peak demand at around 30%. Since I know the equipment being installed am I required to use 220.14 (A)? I feel showing 220.14 (L)(2) is sufficient in providing enough capacity for the PDU as a whole. What checks and balances does the inspector or plan check really have in enforcing 220.14 (A).
How can I as an engineer use the code to provide a VA that is not extremely excessive. All the meter readings I see end up being between 30-35% of the continuous load per the manufacturer. I feel like I am over engineering every piece of equipment.
Any thoughts or better loopholes to use? Can I take the VA and multiply by the manufacturer's efficiency to get a more accurate VA?
Thanks.