• We will be performing upgrades on the forums and server over the weekend. The forums may be unavailable multiple times for up to an hour each. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we work to make the forums even better.

220.16(A) Existing Installations Additions. (2023 NEC)

Merry Christmas

k-rag

Member
Location
Delta, CO
Occupation
Electrician
I am looking for some insight on how to interpret 220.16 regarding dwelling units.

Supposing we have a house that has an unfinished basement. Initially, the load calculation for the home would have to consider the unfinished area as "floor area" since it is "adaptable for future use" (220.5(C)). 220.41 would apply 3VA/ft to this value, then we would complete a standard general lighting calculation. Suppose also in this example that we are only finishing the area as living areas and bedrooms with no additional specific appliance loads.

My first question: 220.16 specifically details dwelling units, and says to use 220.14 to calculate the branch circuit loads when adding to an existing installation. Notice that 220.14(I) begins with "except as covered in 220.41". I'm taking that to mean that 220.14(I) (180VA per receptacle + the lighting load) would not apply in this case since the square footage GL calculation already considered general use lighting and receptacles for that unfinished area (at the time). Simply put, the example would NOT require an increase in the load calculation since it was already considered in the first place. (With the caveat that it would be appropriate to run the calculation again for the whole house to verify). Is this accurate?

My second question: It seems 220.16 is saying we must add the load to the existing load calculation rather than recalculating and applying demand factors. Suppose in another instance, we add a new fastened-in-place appliance. If the house already has 4 or more, does this mean I cannot apply the 75% demand factor per 220.53? 220.16 seems to simply say I must use 220.14(A) and simply add the specific appliance load to the calculation. But the two scenarios give separate results. Which is it?
 

Eddie702

Licensed Electrician
Location
Western Massachusetts
Occupation
Electrician
In a house you can put as many receptacle on a circuit that you want. The 180va applies to commercial. At least that is what Ryan Jackson teaches. I don't believe you have to calculate a basement at 3va/sq foot if it is unfinished
 

k-rag

Member
Location
Delta, CO
Occupation
Electrician
Thanks for the reply! That's my interpretation as well regarding the 180VA.

As far as the basement, look closely at 220.5(C) (formerly 220.11). It has been reworded in the 2023 NEC. It also removed "garages" from the list which implies they are included too since both unfinished basements and a garages are "adaptable for future use as a habitable room or occupiable space".
 

Dennis Alwon

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Chapel Hill, NC
Occupation
Retired Electrical Contractor
Thanks for the reply! That's my interpretation as well regarding the 180VA.

As far as the basement, look closely at 220.5(C) (formerly 220.11). It has been reworded in the 2023 NEC. It also removed "garages" from the list which implies they are included too since both unfinished basements and a garages are "adaptable for future use as a habitable room or occupiable space".
Take a look at 220.83
 

wwhitney

Senior Member
Location
Berkeley, CA
Occupation
Retired
Just wanted to comment that 220.16 is under Part II "Branch-Circuit Load Calculations" so its requirement would apply for calculating the load on new or extended branch circuits in a dwelling unit. Feeder and service loads would be still be calculated via Part III or IV.

Cheers, Wayne
 

k-rag

Member
Location
Delta, CO
Occupation
Electrician
Thanks guys. Please consider this:

Given an existing home:
2500 square feet, dishwasher: 1100, disposal: 900, water heater: 4500, attic fan: 525, furnace: 905, dryer: 4680, range: 10500, elec heat: 19500, AC/AH: 3450.

Standard method:
GL: 6150W (sm app and laundry included)
Appliances: 5948W
Dryer: 5000W
Range: 8000W
Electric Heat: 19500W
AC: omitted
Largest Motor: (furnace 905 x 0.25) 226W
Total: 44824W

Optional method:
2500x3=7500W
sm app, and laundry: 4500W
appliances: 7930W
dryer: 4680W
Range: 10500W
Electric Heat: 19500
AC: omitted
Totals: heat at 100% : 19500. Other loads: 35110, first 10K at 100%, remainder at 40% = 20044W
Total: 39544W

According to 220.83(B):
2500x3=7500W
sm app, and laundry: 4500W
appliances: 7930W
dryer: 4680W
Range: 10500W
Electric Heat: 19500
AC: omitted
Totals: heat at 100% : 19500. Other loads: 35110, first 8K at 100%, remainder at 40% = 18844
Overall Total: 38344W

First of all, check me if I didn't carry the one somewhere. My first observation is the considerable difference. What is the thinking behind having multiple methods?

If I'm reading this right, we are permitted to recalculate the with the new load included using standard or optional, OR we can add the full value of the new load to the method permitted in 220.83? Is that correct?

I struggle to see why they've made this so complicated.
 
Top