When doing the calculations for multifamily dwellings using the optional method, I come up with a lower service load than using the standard part III calculations, as is normal.
However, 220.84 (C)(3) states to use the nameplate rating of ranges for the optional method which obviously eliminates the standard 8kW used in part III table 220.55.
I do not have the actual nameplate rating of these ranges. Is there a substitute value that is generally accepted for a standard range? The typical ranges I've seen are rated around 10.5 to 11.8 kW.
I'm in the pre-bid process on upgrading two apartment building services. Would it be safe to use 11.8 or 12kW in these calculations? I am allowing for an electric range in each of 9 apartments in one building, even though only about half have electric ranges. I felt it would be better to plan on electric ranges (this is an existing, older building, with tenants) even though they are not present in all apartments at this time.
I need to come up with a tentative plan to present to the building dept. for approval before I go any further.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
John
However, 220.84 (C)(3) states to use the nameplate rating of ranges for the optional method which obviously eliminates the standard 8kW used in part III table 220.55.
I do not have the actual nameplate rating of these ranges. Is there a substitute value that is generally accepted for a standard range? The typical ranges I've seen are rated around 10.5 to 11.8 kW.
I'm in the pre-bid process on upgrading two apartment building services. Would it be safe to use 11.8 or 12kW in these calculations? I am allowing for an electric range in each of 9 apartments in one building, even though only about half have electric ranges. I felt it would be better to plan on electric ranges (this is an existing, older building, with tenants) even though they are not present in all apartments at this time.
I need to come up with a tentative plan to present to the building dept. for approval before I go any further.
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
John