wwhitney
Senior Member
- Location
- Berkeley, CA
- Occupation
- Retired
OK, I guess my literalist interpretation is not persuasive. But it's clear to me specific language requiring one to recalculate a dwelling unit load using a method that gives a higher result just because a conductor supplies more than dwelling unit isn't present in article 220.Does not make it correct, but I also find your reasoning there unpersuasive.
I am curious to look at the numbers both ways. Could you point me to or post a realistic but minimal list of loads for a dwelling unit that would meet all the requirements listed in 220.85?
Cheers, Wayne