georgestolz said:Yes.
Why do you think they shouldn't?
hardworkingstiff said:If I understand this correctly, any ungrounded system will allow one phase to have a fault to ground without opening an over current device.
So I believe the only safe way to install an ungrounded system is with a ground fault detection system.
I believe the cost of the ground fault detection system would be much higher than grounding the system.
georgestolz said:Yes.
Why do you think they shouldn't?
dlhoule said:I've seen the metal on 2 adjacent pieces of equipment have 460 Volts between them.
georgestolz said:To be honest, I only said "yes" to help stir a discussion.
Then again, who knows what could qualify as a "school"?
an intact ungrounded system with a ground fault will still not shock someone, correct?
If the source has no connection to earth, there is no circuit path that way, so there is no shock hazard in that way, right?
That's my job.iwire said:Trouble maker
Can you explain more?iwire said:There is enough capacitance coupling of the system to earth that it will still 'light you up' if you get between a hot and grounded objects.
But it is not enough coupling to open and OCPDs.
So it saves equipment downtime but will still put you six feet under.
wireman3736 said:I don't believe I have ever seen an ungrounded system in my area?
two questions come to mind, is this type of installation still allowed
and if it is what would be the benefits of this type of system.![]()
iwire said:That should not happen as the metal equipment is still required to be bonded together.
The second fault should open a OCPD.
That said I still can't see the reason to go this route in a school.