Upon reviewing the 2nd question for 250.122 (page 97), I agree with the answer (EGC does not increase due to adjustments for 4CCC) but not the calculation method on selecting the conductor size.
It references a 40A circuit being increased in size from 8 to 6 for 4 CCC with 60 deg terminals. However, the answer calculation says "8 awg rated at 60C x 0.80 = 32A after adjustment factors is too small for the circuit example. 6 awg rated at 55A at 60C, is required (55A x 0.80 = 44A)."
However, my understanding is that for any adjustment factor for 4CCC would use the 90C column regardless of termination temperature rating per 110.14.C. #8 = 55A @ 90C, 55A x 0.80 = 44A. The number 8 would still be acceptable for the 40A circuit. What am I missing here?
I would also reference (as supporting data) page 52/53 210.19 question/answer on what size branch circuit for a 4-wire 45A nonlinear continuous load. Here the 4CCC adjustment was made using the 90C column.
It references a 40A circuit being increased in size from 8 to 6 for 4 CCC with 60 deg terminals. However, the answer calculation says "8 awg rated at 60C x 0.80 = 32A after adjustment factors is too small for the circuit example. 6 awg rated at 55A at 60C, is required (55A x 0.80 = 44A)."
However, my understanding is that for any adjustment factor for 4CCC would use the 90C column regardless of termination temperature rating per 110.14.C. #8 = 55A @ 90C, 55A x 0.80 = 44A. The number 8 would still be acceptable for the 40A circuit. What am I missing here?
I would also reference (as supporting data) page 52/53 210.19 question/answer on what size branch circuit for a 4-wire 45A nonlinear continuous load. Here the 4CCC adjustment was made using the 90C column.
Last edited: