250.24(C)(2): Do I Use 12.5% Grounded Conductor in Parallel Runs?

Status
Not open for further replies.

George Stolz

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Windsor, CO NEC: 2017
Occupation
Service Manager
My question started out (as I was writing this) as to whether you need to use the 12.5% rule given in 250.24(C)(1) when in a (C)(2) scenario, since (C)(2) references (C)(1).

Now, after trying to contrive a situation that would call for this and failing to create one resulting in a greater-than-3/0 grounded conductor, is there even a way to reasonably get a result bigger than 3/0? :huh:
 

Volta

Senior Member
Location
Columbus, Ohio
My question started out (as I was writing this) as to whether you need to use the 12.5% rule given in 250.24(C)(1) when in a (C)(2) scenario, since (C)(2) references (C)(1).

Now, after trying to contrive a situation that would call for this and failing to create one resulting in a greater-than-3/0 grounded conductor, is there even a way to reasonably get a result bigger than 3/0? :huh:

I am not sure if I understand- if one pulled 1500 kcmil hots, for whatever reason, wouldn't 12.5% require a 4/0? Am I on the right track here?
 

Volta

Senior Member
Location
Columbus, Ohio
Yeah, or 6" PVC. But I sure do see what you're saying. All that work for 625 amps, not likely. Parallel 500 kcmil in 4" EMT with a 1/0 EGC and you get 688 amps....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top