• We will be performing upgrades on the forums and server over the weekend. The forums may be unavailable multiple times for up to an hour each. Thank you for your patience and understanding as we work to make the forums even better.

250.6 vs. 250.58

Merry Christmas
Status
Not open for further replies.

bphgravity

Senior Member
Location
Florida
Are these two Article requirements in conflict? :confused:

250.6(A)The grounding of electrical systems, circuit conductors, surge arrestors, and conductive non-current-carrying materials and equipment shall be installed and arranged in a manner that will prevent objectionable current over the grounding conductors or grounding path.


250.58 Where an ac system is connected to a grounding electrode in or at a building as specified in 250.24 and 250.32, the same electrode shall be used to ground conductor enclosures and equipment in or on that building. Where separate services supply a building and are required to be connected to a grounding electrode, the same grounding electrode shall be used.
 

roger

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Fl
Occupation
Retired Electrician
Re: 250.6 vs. 250.58

Bryan, how would using one GE for all grounding, no matter how many services, create an objectionable current path? Or am I missing your question?

Roger
 

dereckbc

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Plano, TX
Re: 250.6 vs. 250.58

Bryan I do not see any conflict. If you use a single point method or radial technique, it is impossible for objectionable current to flow. If your were to use different GE's for different systems you would put personnel and equipment in danger.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top