He posted nameplate of this motor in another thread. Makes no sense to me either but that is what nameplate said. IIRC was also rated 400-480 volts, so probably not built to NEMA standards? Could be errors involved I suppose.
I see that now. it says 440-480V though, not 400-480V.
Still, you can't change physics, they are laws, not suggestions.
When you know HP and want current, it is 1.732 x E x I x EFF x PF / 746. Assuming 480V and .8PF and working backward using the 48A value, the motor would need to be
112.6% efficient... That of course is impossible.
My guess would be that the "48.2HP" number is the typical consumer "marketing BS" HP number, like what people put on compressors and table saws sold at the hardware store. It is the "
developed HP" meaning they are calculating the
mechanical HP based on when speed drops under a step change in load and the motor goes into Break Down Torque for a second or two. BDT is typically 200%+ of FLT on a Design B motor, so taking that backward on a napkin note, it's more likely a standard 22kW 380V 50Hz motor, which when run at 60Hz becomes 26.4kW, then converted to HP becomes 35.4HP in which case the 48A seems more reasonable.
Bottom line, ignore the HP value on that nameplate, it is "marketing" HP. The 48A is the real value you need to use and from the NEC standpoint, I would use 40HP for sizing the conductors and OCPD.