ron
Senior Member
- Location
- New York, 40.7514,-73.9925
Is there any official documentation identifing a typo for this section. Modifying the words "complying with (a),(b),and(c)" to read "complying with (a),(b) or (c)" ?
645.5(D)(5) IT Room cables below floor
- Thread starter ron
- Start date
- Status
Re: 645.5(D)(5) IT Room cables below floor
I think they are effectively saying cables in (2) are exempt AND cables complying with (a) are exempt AND cables complying with (b) are exempt AND cables complying with (c) are exempt.
It seems a little more clear if you look at the first "AND" - "except cables covered in (2) AND...." You wouldn't expect the cable to meet (2) and (a) and (b) and (c).
In other words, cables in (a) and in (b) and in (c) are exempt. I think this paragraph wins the award for most confusing use of conjunctions.
Steve
I think they are effectively saying cables in (2) are exempt AND cables complying with (a) are exempt AND cables complying with (b) are exempt AND cables complying with (c) are exempt.
It seems a little more clear if you look at the first "AND" - "except cables covered in (2) AND...." You wouldn't expect the cable to meet (2) and (a) and (b) and (c).
In other words, cables in (a) and in (b) and in (c) are exempt. I think this paragraph wins the award for most confusing use of conjunctions.
Steve
- Status