I would hate to pull either but given the choice, off the top of my noggin, I would guess 3 -- 2 1/2" runs of 300 KCM.
When I do the calc based on thhn, you did not say what insulation, the 2.5" emt with 300 kcm is a 32% fill
The 3" EMT with the 500 KCM is a 30% fill. Given the closeness of the % I would still go with the smaller wire sizes.
how about a little more info
how many disconnects
what is the se demand
maybe 4 2" with 3/0 cu 75 deg C
I would do what Trevor says simply because he has pulled wire those sizes. I have not. My question to Trevor would be the 4- 90's and how difficult that would be. I assume the OP has a winch of some sort and not pulling by hand.
Good idea with the long radius sweeps. I forgot about them. So you would go with 2- runs of 500KCM , I take it.I wouldn't think twice , long radius sweeps w/ puller piece of cake, and plenty of lube. Done it quite a few times in the past 43 years.:grin:
Good idea with the long radius sweeps. I forgot about them. So you would go with 2- runs of 500KCM , I take it.
My mind is always in the manual mode of men pulling rather than machine. It's been 30 years since I used a puller.
are the raceways outside??Would it be better to put the 300MCM in a 3" ? It is THHN.
Longer radius do not really change the pulling force required they only spread out the sidewall pressure on the insulltion better than a short radius.
Seeing as a machine is needed either way I would use 500s in 3" EMT.
are the raceways outside??
I could cut down on my degree of bends by 45deg. Doing a 45deg kick instead of double 90's. I do not think it would look as nice but I would do it if you think it would be easier to pull.
I believe cpal was asking about using THHN in a wet location outside.
exactly although most cables that size should have a dual listing I would hope one of them has a W in it