AC Condensing units

Status
Not open for further replies.

mbsi

Member
I have two residential AC units to wire. A single feeder to a outdoor sub-panel,two breakers and whips to the unit. The unit ratings (name plate on unit) are 27min 40 max, and 34min 60 max. The wiring and breaker for the feeder is in question. Is it 34 x 1.25 + 27 = 69.5 or 60 x 1.25 + 27 =102. There is a existing #2 AL SER in place on a 100amp breaker.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

This is not the same as figuring individual motor loads.

This type of HVAC equipment the NEC calls Multimotor and Combination-Load Equipment.

Take a look at 440.4(B)

You can forget about the 1.25 when feeding equipment like this.

The MCA (minimum circuit ampacity) stated on the units already have the 1.25 figured in.

27 + 34 = 61 amps minimum feeder capacity needed.

Unit 1 with a MCA of 27 could be wired with 10 AWG and a 40 amp breaker

Unit 2 with a MCA of 34 could also be wired with 10 AWG and a 60 amp breaker.

The 100 amp breaker and the 2 AL feeding the subpanel will be fine unless there are other loads you have not spoken of.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Unit 2 with a MCA of 34 could also be wired with 10 AWG and a 60 amp breaker
If the unit were wired with romex could you still use the #10 AWG, or would you need to use the 60 degree column in table 310.16?
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Originally posted by infinity:
If the unit were wired with romex could you still use the #10 AWG, or would you need to use the 60 degree column in table 310.16?
Good point, one that I often forget :eek: as I seldom wire HVAC equipment with NM.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

We use nm all the time for this and if in a home run it as normal and when it emerges we run it out a pvc lb and pc to the disc. then a flex non metallic sealtite to the unit less than 6 ft in lengdth.works well for us and eleiminates the need for pipe inside the house. We run everything in 3/4. Where in the code does it say that the 25% is already figured in or is this just what an experienced guru such as an i wire just knows?

[ June 17, 2005, 10:10 PM: Message edited by: stew ]
 
Re: AC Condensing units

The nameplate minimum ampacity for the compressor branch circuit includes the 25% required by 2005 NEC section 440.32. The 27A and the 34A are the minimum ampacity of the conductors needed to supply the compressors, No. 10awg, cu for the 27A compressor and No. 8awg, cu for the 34A compressor. However if the OCD and controller terminations are rated 75 degrees C, No. 10awg, 75 or 90 degree conductors can be used for the 34A compressor.

It seems that the 100A breaker is used as a feeder, in that case, section 440.32 is applicable and results in 27A + 34A + (.24x34A) = 69.5A which allows a minimum of No. 4awg, cu as the feeder provided the terminations are rated for 75 degrees C.

The No. 2 Al conductors have sufficient ampacity to carry the load in accordance with the NEC. however, the 100 amp breaker suppling the No. 2 Al is a violation, it must not be greater than 90 amperes for 75 degree terminations.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

pierre tell me what 240.4D has to do with this? 334.80 specifically says that the ampacities of nm,nmc and nms shal be determined in accordance with 310.15. The ampacity shal be in accordance with the 60 deg table. I cannot see where 240.4 d pertains and where does the 10 gage limitaion come from?
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Stew
240.4(D) limits the overcurrent protection of small conductors, so the 60 degree column for those size conductors will not affect the size of the overcurrent device, as 240.4(D) already does that.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Stew
240.4(D) limits the overcurrent protection of small conductors, so the 60 degree column for those size conductors will not affect the size of the overcurrent device, as 240.4(D) already does that.

Look at the 60 degree column ampacity values, then take a look at the ampacity values required in 240.4(D).
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Originally posted by stew:
Where in the code does it say that the 25% is already figured in or is this just what an experienced guru such as an i wire just knows?
First off that is code geek, not guru. :D

I think that we should start at where the 'extra' 25% is required for HVAC units.

One place would be 440.32

440.32 Single Motor-Compressor.
Branch-circuit conductors supplying a single motor-compressor shall have an ampacity not less than 125 percent of either the motor-compressor rated-load current or the branch-circuit selection current, whichever is greater.
For a wye-start, delta-run connected motor-compressor, the selection of branch-circuit conductors between the controller and the motor-compressor shall be permitted to be based on 58 percent of either the motor-compressor rated-load current or the branch-circuit selection current, whichever is greater.
Notice that section only applies to Single Motor-Compressor.

The same basic requirement is also in 440.33 Motor-Compressor(s) With or Without Additional Motor Loads.

Neither of those sections apply to the HVAC units that we normally install, the section that does apply is 440.35.

440.35 Multimotor and Combination-Load Equipment.

The ampacity of the conductors supplying multimotor and combination-load equipment shall not be less than the minimum circuit ampacity marked on the equipment in accordance with 440.4(B).
In this section you will notice the absence of the 25% extra required for single compressors or Motor-Compressor(s) With or Without Additional Motor Loads.

You will also notice it references 440.4(B) which basically says the manufacturer will be responsible for the calculations and mark the unit with the minimum supply circuit conductor ampacity, and the maximum rating of the branch-circuit short-circuit and ground-fault protective device.

A unit marked with an minimum supply circuit conductor ampacity of 20 amps and a maximum branch-circuit short-circuit and ground-fault protective device of 35 could be wired with 14/2 NM and a 35 amp breaker.

We use nm all the time for this and if in a home run it as normal and when it emerges we run it out a pvc lb and pc to the disc.
I have some bad news for you here, if you are running the NM in the PVC outside you have a violation.

NM is not rated for wet locations, outdoor raceways are wet locations.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Originally posted by pierre:
Stew
240.4(D) limits the overcurrent protection of small conductors, so the 60 degree column for those size conductors will not affect the size of the overcurrent device, as 240.4(D) already does that.

Look at the 60 degree column ampacity values, then take a look at the ampacity values required in 240.4(D).
Pierre, you've got the cart in front of the horse, IMO.

If we're talking about A/C's, then 240.4(D) dismisses itself from the discussion. It no longer exists.

So 334.80 is the code-mechanism behind following the 60? ampacity. Otherwise, you're back to a 90? rated cable, why use the 60? ampacities? Because 334.80 requires it. :)
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Originally posted by stew:
ill be danged! Never thot about wet location requirement.
Stew I'll be honest here, I think this is a non-issue, I have not seen any problems from doing what you describe and it is common around here.

But it is IMO a NEC violation. :roll:
 
Re: AC Condensing units

So 334.80 is the code-mechanism behind following the 60? ampacity. Otherwise, you're back to a 90? rated cable, why use the 60? ampacities? Because 334.80 requires it
I'm with George on this one. 334.80 makes no exception for an AC unit to be wired with type NM cable using any thing other than the 60 degree column in 310.16 even if we need to derate it. 60 degree ampacity is the maximum permitted.
 
Re: AC Condensing units

Pierre,
240.4(D) has nothing to do with the ampacity of a conductor, it just limits the size of the OCPD that can be used with the conductors that are covered by that section. While the size of the OCPD and the ampacity of the conductor are related, they are not the same. As George pointed out, 240.4(D) also does not apply in air conditioner installations.
Don
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top