Clangy said:
Your right. im not familiar with hot and cold leg, only switch leg.
The word "leg" simply means one section of a circuit, similar to one leg of a route, and the word "circuit" is also used to describe a closed loop such as a race track. Such a closed loop is required to have a circuit in both senses.
I do understand hot and neutral from work experience. grounded and ungrounded ive learned a lot about from this website.
When a circuit contains a neutral, it is the conductor to be grounded, if so required. Ungrounded refers to any other conductor, especially one 'hot' relative to earth, a grounded conductor, or (most often) both.
I never knew there was a load carried from the grounded (neutral) conductor during alternating invervals in the ac circuit . . .
In reality, the electron flow from the point of excess electrons (the 'negative' terminal) to the point of a lack of electrons (the 'positive' terminal) is not relevant to the flow of electricity from an ungrounded conductor to a grounded conductor, earth, or other grounded object or surface.
In other words, whether the moment in time is during the half-cycle where the 'hot' wire is positive relative to ground (or the neutral, the EGC, etc.), or the other half-cycle where the 'hot' wire is negative relative to ground, the hot wire will be the one considered to be the source of the electricity.
Alternating current merely means that the electron flow reverses twice per cycle, and yes, that means that 50% of the time, the source of electrons is the grounded conductor, but only in circuits with a grounded conductor. The alternating of polarity is the same regardless.
All AC circuits exhibit the same 'taking turns' of the conductors being the source of electrons, but again, the hot wire, the ungrounded conductor, will test hot relative to the earth. This would be true in DC circuits, also regardless of actual polarity.
In a car, for example, even in the days when many vehicles had positive-ground systems, the 'ungrounded', or 'hot' wire was seen as the source of electricity relative to the chassis and/or body. You could even have a car with neither battery terminal grounded.
Take a Corvette, for example, which has a fiberglass body. Every electrical component has a negative wire, because there is no all-encompassing metal cage to use as one giant 'neutral' conductor, or 'return path'.
In theory, either battery terminal could be tied to the metal chassis, and everything would work the same. You'd have two circuit conductors for every load, and one would simply be tied to the chassis. This is the basics of our grounded conductor.
Clangy said:
The professor of my code class warned me about confusing them. Would this be an example of system grounding?
The grounding electrode conductor(s) and system(s) are system grounding. Bonding a circuit conductor to the grounding system is, in some cases, optional, but grounding/bonding non-current-carrying conductive parts is practically universal.