Re: Administrators License $$$?
I hope that this will not come across as too strong. But this comes close to touching upon a topic for which I hold strong feelings. If I am not correct in my understanding of the intent of the question, then please forgive what would then be an inappropriate answer. But here is my perspective on my topic of concern (which may or may not be the same topic that the original poster intended to express).
I hold an ?unassigned? (if I am using that term in the same context) Electrical Administrator?s License in Washington State. It is not for sale, nor even for lease. And nor, for that matter, is my PE license for sale or lease. If someone wants to hire me to do work, and is willing to pay a fair rate for my services, then I am open to discussions.
But I have heard of PEs who have no more involvement in a project than to seal the document when someone else has done all the work, and to collect a fee for applying the seal. I view that as unprofessional, unlawful, and distasteful behavior. If ever I knew, as a moral certainty, that a fellow professional engineer had sold his or her license in this manner, I would report the facts to the licensing authority. I would fully expect the license to be revoked, and the offender to be fined.
But here is a different set of circumstances.
If I were to be asked to allow an electrical contractor to make use of my Administrator license, and if I were to agree, then I would believe myself to be bound by law and by professional ethics to perform the actions that my Administrator license requires of me. I would hold myself responsible for the safe performance of the construction work. I would hold myself responsible for ensuring that the work is designed and installed in accordance with all applicable codes. I would be there on site, for some appropriate portion of the time that the electrical personnel are doing their jobs. In other words, I would earn my fee not by virtue of having the Administrator?s license, but rather by virtue of being the Electrical Administrator.
I fear that the wording of the original question has led me to wonder if the original poster has the same view of the nature of the license. If you do, then I again apologize for venting in what appears to be your direction. If you agree with my perspective, then please allow that I was merely venting, but not in your direction.
But to anyone who reads this, please be advised: Don?t ever tell me that you are merely charging a fee for someone else to use your license, and that you have no interest or involvement in the work itself. For if you tell me this, or if I come across evidence that this is happening, I will turn you in.