Defenestrator
Member
- Location
- Denver, CO
- Occupation
- Electrical Engineer
Do you guys have a design checklist?
Such a checklist doesn't exist at my firm and no one will give a straight answer as they don't want to be responsible for neglecting a design aspect. This has been a common theme for every form I've worked at.
Background: I'm an electrical PE with 8yrs experience working as a consulting engineer for large mission critical data center clients.
I have received feedback from my manager that I need to learn to be more diligent about deadlines.
I'm really burnt out by this industry. I hope that having a realistic idea for design due diligence would help.
I struggle with perfectionism. The solution to perfectionism is to clearly define what the benchmark of a "passing" outcome is. Anything beyond said benchmark is overkill. I understand the need to protect the safety and welfare of the public as the number 1 priority though. But, there must be a point where, continuing beyond which, the returns on the effort put in flattens out on a graph.
I'm not sure what counts as "good" vs overkill. Which details are important and which aren't the end of the world if incorrect.
Also, I'm frustrated because no matter how hard I try and how many past lessons I learned from getting my teeth kicked in by senior engineers and management, something is always incorrect. The requirements are never clear cut and everyone has a different opinion on what the necessities are. And I think we can all vouch for what happens when you tell an engineer they are incorrect .
Such a checklist doesn't exist at my firm and no one will give a straight answer as they don't want to be responsible for neglecting a design aspect. This has been a common theme for every form I've worked at.
Background: I'm an electrical PE with 8yrs experience working as a consulting engineer for large mission critical data center clients.
I have received feedback from my manager that I need to learn to be more diligent about deadlines.
I'm really burnt out by this industry. I hope that having a realistic idea for design due diligence would help.
I struggle with perfectionism. The solution to perfectionism is to clearly define what the benchmark of a "passing" outcome is. Anything beyond said benchmark is overkill. I understand the need to protect the safety and welfare of the public as the number 1 priority though. But, there must be a point where, continuing beyond which, the returns on the effort put in flattens out on a graph.
I'm not sure what counts as "good" vs overkill. Which details are important and which aren't the end of the world if incorrect.
Also, I'm frustrated because no matter how hard I try and how many past lessons I learned from getting my teeth kicked in by senior engineers and management, something is always incorrect. The requirements are never clear cut and everyone has a different opinion on what the necessities are. And I think we can all vouch for what happens when you tell an engineer they are incorrect .