many building departments will require you demonstrate that the AIC rating of new equipment exceeds the available fault current seen at the line side of the new equipment.
The OP did not mention he needs to demonstrate to the building department the AIC rating selected/used; I prefer not to speculate, he wanted to select downstream equipment.
cannot assume the original gear was specified correctly without taking on liability.
Hence why I said, ASSUMING it was originally sized properly
Just for fun, we can make a whole bunch of assumptions:
Utility transformer installed stepping distribution voltage down to 208Y/120V service.
Service side sees system as an infinite bus.
Utility transformer as low as 1.7% impedance.
65KA @ 1.7%Z; guessing 1200A main breaker; MVAsc from system is 23.42MVAsc
200A feeder breakers sized on current; i.e. no up-size in cable due to VD. #3/0AWG 75degC Col.
Cable run in EMT, Table 9: Xl = 0.052 ohms/1000ft
Ckt length 50ft (conservative) = MVAsc of cable is = 16.64MVAsc
So, MVAsc at new MLO panel = 9.73MVAsc, or 27kA