data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13316/13316d1971f0e5957ee35a377b80200062a40b11" alt="68D405AC-B86B-4B02-A2D4-8FAFD24B5EB0.jpeg 68D405AC-B86B-4B02-A2D4-8FAFD24B5EB0.jpeg"
No. The A/C contains its own overload protection, so the breaker only needs to provide sort-circuit protection.if the breaker is 45 amp and the wire is rated for 35 wouldn’t we want to change the breaker to match the wire size.
Yes. See 240.4.Or is there something about air condensers that I’m missing?
MCA is the result of 1.25 x compressor rated amps plus the condenser fan motor. I come up with figure very close to what it has, might be there is one more digit on the fan motor that isn't readable anymore that is throwing my result off just a little.View attachment 2559868I usually use the max breaker size and size the wire based on that. The customer Has a 45 amp breaker with 10 awg wire. It’s hard to read but it looks like the minimum ampacity and fla of the equipment contradict each other. Would the minimum circuit ampacity supersede the fla based on the unit isn’t running at full capacity? If so would it just be a breaker change for the 10 awg wire?
Not really based on LRC but rather some multiple of the rated or full load current. NEC maximums are 2.5 times for inverse time and 8 times for instantaneous trip with regular induction motors. There is provisions to increase that if it won't allow the motor to start. Many manufacturer tables and charts can be less than the 250% the NEC allows as their recommendation.Thanks guys I appreciate the feedback. I always knew that instantaneous trip breakers were sized based on the LRC with overload relays at the equipment. I did not realize inverse time breakers were to be sized based on LRC in some cases. It all makes sense now. Thanks!