I wasnt implying anything, I thought my meaning was very clear. If an exam is limited in its scope (as the Alaska exam certainly is) then many people will only study for whats going to be on the exam which doesnt make for very well rounded knowledge. If you are already well experienced and knowledgeable then maybe its a moot point for you. But apprentices and those with little experience/knowledge read forums too. I just dont think for them to have foreknowledge of an exams content is a good idea. And I would hesitate to say that telling them would be "helping" them.
At the same time though, I have long had disagreement with the way exams are formatted and given around the country, they generally only test a portion of what people should know. The overwhelming majority have no hands on testing of any kind, and a lot of the questions they ask are very debatable about their importance for a journeyman to know. Of course this doesnt mean that some folks who pass them arent very well qualified. And conversely I have known extremely knowledgeable electricians who couldnt pass some of these written tests, it works both ways.
Anyway, the whole purpose of an exam should be to accurately test what you know about a wide range of things in our field. If you know ahead of time what is going to be asked, then that makes these already flawed exams even less accurate as a gauge of that.
If you have read my other posts here or elsewhere then you know I have never asked about exam content, at least not on a public forum, and this is why.
Probably shouldnt have said anything.