Juason
New member
- Location
- Texas, USA
Hello everyone. I recently ran across an example of what I believe to be a flameproof design utilizing encapsulation to provide Class 1 Div 1 product certification. Without revealing the product, the certification was specified as:
CSA Ex II 2G EEx md IIC T5
Cl 1; Zone 1; Ex md IIC T4
Cl I; Div 1; Grps. A, B, C, D; T4
The md describes how encapsulation and flameproofing are used as the protection mechanisms.
The 60079 standard appears to list only Pressurized "x", Intrinsically safe "ia/ib" or Explosion proof designs, as viable protection mechanisms in Div 1 areas. Encapsulation and Flameproof would be acceptable only for Zone 1 locations. Zone 1 certified products cannot be used in Div 1 locations specifically because of this difference in allowable protection mechanisms.
Am I correct in my assessment of this, or are they just not listing some alternate protection method by which Div 1 certification was reached?
Thanks!
CSA Ex II 2G EEx md IIC T5
Cl 1; Zone 1; Ex md IIC T4
Cl I; Div 1; Grps. A, B, C, D; T4
The md describes how encapsulation and flameproofing are used as the protection mechanisms.
The 60079 standard appears to list only Pressurized "x", Intrinsically safe "ia/ib" or Explosion proof designs, as viable protection mechanisms in Div 1 areas. Encapsulation and Flameproof would be acceptable only for Zone 1 locations. Zone 1 certified products cannot be used in Div 1 locations specifically because of this difference in allowable protection mechanisms.
Am I correct in my assessment of this, or are they just not listing some alternate protection method by which Div 1 certification was reached?
Thanks!