Ampacity Reduction

Status
Not open for further replies.
bkg73123 said:
In this article by Mike Holt why aren't the primary conductors ampacity reduced by 20% as well as the secondary conductors?
www.ecmweb.com

Transformer Installation Made Easy, Sort of

OK, it won't be easy, but these five steps will help your next transformer installation run more smoothly.
www.ecmweb.com www.ecmweb.com
Click to expand...
The secondary conductors include a neutral, and the rather old article includes the assumption that a majority of the loads supplied are non-linear, so that the neutral counts as a CCC. [I believe that in practice these days, that is almost never warranted, so you'd only have 3 secondary CCCs.] With 4 CCCs on the secondary, you need an 80% ampacity adjustment factor.

The transformer primary is delta, so there are just 3 line conductors run to it, no neutral. With only 3 CCCs, there's no need to apply any ampacity adjustment factor.

Cheers, Wayne
 
wwhitney said:
The secondary conductors include a neutral, and the rather old article includes the assumption that a majority of the loads supplied are non-linear, so that the neutral counts as a CCC. [I believe that in practice these days, that is almost never warranted, so you'd only have 3 secondary CCCs.] With 4 CCCs on the secondary, you need an 80% ampacity adjustment factor.

The transformer primary is delta, so there are just 3 line conductors run to it, no neutral. With only 3 CCCs, there's no need to apply any ampacity adjustment factor.

Cheers, Wayne
Click to expand...
So according to current code requirements 600kcmil conductors would work, since neutral not considered ccc, correct?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top