rcasey
New member
- Location
- Crestview, Okaloosa, Florida
Clarification, to help me understand a local inspectors view on SER cable. He refers me to the following;
Article 338.10 (B) (4) (a) SE cables for interior wiring shall comply with Part II of Article 334.
Article 334.80 referring me to the fact that SER is treated as NM cable & thus is rated in the 60deg C column for ampacity. Thus a #2 aluminum conductor (SER) is only being allowed to be on a maximum
of an 80 amp breaker. I am ok with all of this if the SER is a sub-feed circuit, as to an appliance.
This issue is when it is the feeder for a distribution panel.
I refer back to Article 310.15 (B) (6) and the associated table. This allows rating of 100amp for this
conductor.
Am I reading this incorrectly? If so, please explain. I want to satisfy the inspectors wishes, but I also
want to stand my ground if I am correct, but in a polite manner.
Appreciate any assistance from the forum.
Article 338.10 (B) (4) (a) SE cables for interior wiring shall comply with Part II of Article 334.
Article 334.80 referring me to the fact that SER is treated as NM cable & thus is rated in the 60deg C column for ampacity. Thus a #2 aluminum conductor (SER) is only being allowed to be on a maximum
of an 80 amp breaker. I am ok with all of this if the SER is a sub-feed circuit, as to an appliance.
This issue is when it is the feeder for a distribution panel.
I refer back to Article 310.15 (B) (6) and the associated table. This allows rating of 100amp for this
conductor.
Am I reading this incorrectly? If so, please explain. I want to satisfy the inspectors wishes, but I also
want to stand my ground if I am correct, but in a polite manner.
Appreciate any assistance from the forum.