Bob NH
Senior Member
- Location
- The "Live Free or Die" State
There is an occasional question about using 310.15(B)(6) for feeders that don't meet the requirement for "Main power feeder".
Here is an example of how the ampacities compare if you use Annex B.
Let's take the case of Aluminum 2-2-2-4 SE R.
As a main power feeder, it would have an ampacity of 100 Amps per Table 310.15(B)(6).
As a general feeder it would have an ampacity of 90 Amps per Table 310.16, at an ambient temperature of 26-30 C.
Using Table B.310.3 it would have an ampacity of 92 Amps at 40 C ambient, but to put it on the same basis as 310.16, the ampacity must be adjusted by applying the temperature factor at the bottom of Table B.310.3. The factor for 26-30 C ambient is 1.13, which results in an ampacity of 103.96 Amps.
I also checked the case of 2 AWG copper, with virtually the same answer.
Based on the calculation for 2 AWG copper and aluminum, I conclude that the ampacities of Table 310.16 would have to be increased by about 15% to match the ampacities calculated from Table B.310.3 for the same ambient temperature.
I think that answer supports the comment by Bob (iwire) at Post #9 of the following link that the NEC should take the conservatism out of their calculations. http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=83883
Does anyone else have any comments on, or experience using, the ampacities calculated from the tables of Annex B?
Here is an example of how the ampacities compare if you use Annex B.
Let's take the case of Aluminum 2-2-2-4 SE R.
As a main power feeder, it would have an ampacity of 100 Amps per Table 310.15(B)(6).
As a general feeder it would have an ampacity of 90 Amps per Table 310.16, at an ambient temperature of 26-30 C.
Using Table B.310.3 it would have an ampacity of 92 Amps at 40 C ambient, but to put it on the same basis as 310.16, the ampacity must be adjusted by applying the temperature factor at the bottom of Table B.310.3. The factor for 26-30 C ambient is 1.13, which results in an ampacity of 103.96 Amps.
I also checked the case of 2 AWG copper, with virtually the same answer.
Based on the calculation for 2 AWG copper and aluminum, I conclude that the ampacities of Table 310.16 would have to be increased by about 15% to match the ampacities calculated from Table B.310.3 for the same ambient temperature.
I think that answer supports the comment by Bob (iwire) at Post #9 of the following link that the NEC should take the conservatism out of their calculations. http://forums.mikeholt.com/showthread.php?t=83883
Does anyone else have any comments on, or experience using, the ampacities calculated from the tables of Annex B?