Arc flash from broken primary

Status
Not open for further replies.

mdshunk

Senior Member
Location
Right here.
That one went around a month or so ago. It was a tree trimmer accident, if I remember right. Nobody was hurt, as I remember, but the house was toast.
 

76nemo

Senior Member
Location
Ogdensburg, NY
I just talked to a supervisor over our grid early this week. The were transferring a temporary flat bed tranny over to a new tranny, 115K line. I asked him about PPE and working on their switchgear. He told me they are not required to wear full siuts. I asked him his personal opinion on that, he questioned what company I was from, like I was independent looking to raise a stink:roll:

Guess maybe I am the oldball:confused:
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
76nemo said:
I just talked to a supervisor over our grid early this week. The were transferring a temporary flat bed tranny over to a new tranny, 115K line. I asked him about PPE and working on their switchgear. He told me they are not required to wear full siuts. I asked him his personal opinion on that, he questioned what company I was from, like I was independent looking to raise a stink:roll:

Guess maybe I am the oldball:confused:

OSHA has a different set of rules (other than NFPA 70E) for utility "line" workers. I believe that these utility rules will be incorporating arc flash protection in 2008.
 

76nemo

Senior Member
Location
Ogdensburg, NY
jim dungar said:
OSHA has a different set of rules (other than NFPA 70E) for utility "line" workers. I believe that these utility rules will be incorporating arc flash protection in 2008.

Do you have a different set of rules Jim? I know what I'd be wearing, 10, 20, 30+ years in, or not. I'm in suit, and I can only personally speak for myself:rolleyes:
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
76nemo said:
Do you have a different set of rules Jim? I know what I'd be wearing, 10, 20, 30+ years in, or not. I'm in suit, and I can only personally speak for myself:rolleyes:

What suit would you be in when working on a 69kV line? Do you know what the typical arc flash incident energy is for a utility distribution system? While I have not performed these calculations, I am pretty sure that a NFPA70E hazard risk category 4 "moon" suit would be inappropiate.
 

76nemo

Senior Member
Location
Ogdensburg, NY
jim dungar said:
What suit would you be in when working on a 69kV line? Do you know what the typical arc flash incident energy is for a utility distribution system? While I have not performed these calculations, I am pretty sure that a NFPA70E hazard risk category 4 "moon" suit would be inappropiate.

Yes, better than wearing coverall's. I guess I would look like the Michelin man:roll: I see your point, point well taken, but I think most of these guys were in coveralls because it was so cold:-?
 

zog

Senior Member
Location
Charlotte, NC
jim dungar said:
OSHA has a different set of rules (other than NFPA 70E) for utility "line" workers. I believe that these utility rules will be incorporating arc flash protection in 2008.

Yes they do (NESC), there is alot of pressure for them to follow 70E, matter of fact the 2009 70E ROP's tried to squeze utilities in the next revision and they (Utilities) fought it hard, and still are. There is a good article in the Spring 2008 NETA World magazine on this battle written by a 70E commitee member.
 

zog

Senior Member
Location
Charlotte, NC
jim dungar said:
What suit would you be in when working on a 69kV line? Do you know what the typical arc flash incident energy is for a utility distribution system? While I have not performed these calculations, I am pretty sure that a NFPA70E hazard risk category 4 "moon" suit would be inappropiate.

Jim, if you have the software, play around with this senario, much less than you would think, low fault currents (Compared to some 480V systems) and fast clearing times.
 

jim dungar

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Wisconsin
Occupation
PE (Retired) - Power Systems
zog said:
Jim, if you have the software, play around with this senario, much less than you would think, low fault currents (Compared to some 480V systems) and fast clearing times.

Zog,

That is really what I meant when I said that HRC 4 clothing would be inappropiate. It would be excessive and probably not compatible with voltage ratings required. Also, the working distance, usually much more than the 18" @ 480V, also helps to "reduce" the AFIE at these higher voltages.
 

don_resqcapt19

Moderator
Staff member
Location
Illinois
Occupation
retired electrician
The other thing that reduces the arc flash effect for linemen is the fact that in many cases they are not working in equipment...they are up in the air and the flash energy goes in all directions...not forced at the worker by the equipment enclosure.
 

zog

Senior Member
Location
Charlotte, NC
jim dungar said:
Zog,

That is really what I meant when I said that HRC 4 clothing would be inappropiate. It would be excessive and probably not compatible with voltage ratings required. Also, the working distance, usually much more than the 18" @ 480V, also helps to "reduce" the AFIE at these higher voltages.


Sorry Jim, misunderstood your post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top