jeff48356
Senior Member
- Location
- Livonia, Michigan
AFCI breakers have been in force for about 15 years now, and I was just wondering how effective they actually have been over these last 15 years in reducing the number of house fires. Most electricians hate them, since they only drive up the cost of their projects, and cause inconvenience to homeowners (resulting in many callbacks) due to nuisance tripping (when there actually is no reason to trip in the first place). Have we reached a point where AFCI's have deterred homebuyers from buying new construction, and opting for houses built before the Code requirement?
Is there any true, unbiased proof that these have actually met their goals over the past 15 years, or is this just something that electrical engineers have been cramming down our throats just to line their pockets? Personally, I think they are unnecessary, and 99% of the arc-fault problems would be resolved simply by taking extra time and care to ensure that good connections are made at all times. A home built 20 years ago before the requirement is not any less safe to occupy than one built today is.
Is there any true, unbiased proof that these have actually met their goals over the past 15 years, or is this just something that electrical engineers have been cramming down our throats just to line their pockets? Personally, I think they are unnecessary, and 99% of the arc-fault problems would be resolved simply by taking extra time and care to ensure that good connections are made at all times. A home built 20 years ago before the requirement is not any less safe to occupy than one built today is.