Article 352 Ridgid Nonmetalic Conduit:Type RNC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr. M

Member
Location
CT
A student in our electrical class asked when RNC was introduced to our trade.
Please advice.

Thanks,
Mr. M
 
infinity said:
Around here it was called Orangeburg pipe.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking about. I just ran across this:

"For many years, especially between the years of 1930 and 1960, and to some extent in the 1970's, a special type of conduit has been used to house underground electrical power cables. This special conduit is a fibrous duct made of wooden pulp impregnated with coal tar. The two most common interior diameters with which the ducts have been created are 4 inches interior diameter and 5 inches interior diameter. Over the years many such conduits have deteriorated and blisters have been built up in many of the underground ducts."
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
There was also something called "transite" (sp?) and that product contained asbestoses.
Don
Did they use that for conduit? I see old Transite pipe used for furnace flues quite often.
 
don_resqcapt19 said:
There was also something called "transite" (sp?) and that product contained asbestoses.
Don
It was used a lot for water mains. Water crews have special training on how to repair it. Its not a health hazard for water, but only if you breath the fibers.
 
When PVC first came into the NEC, its used was restricted due to concerns with fire and smoke production. A proposal from Carlon for the 1980 (?) NEC was met with stiff opposition from the steel tube industry. STI=PVC is a fire hazard. PVC+ if you don't let us use it, we will sue for restraint of trade. It was not voted in, and was appealed all the way to the supreme court. As a result.the way code changes are appealed was changed. Now we use PVC nearly every where.
 
Tom,
It was not voted in, and was appealed all the way to the supreme court.
Are you sure? I thought the only one that went to the courts was the ENT article where one or more of the metal conduit manufacturers "stacked" the meeting when that article was voted on. They paid for the NFPA membership and sent their people to the meeting to vote that article down. It delayed the entry of ENT into the code for a full code cycle. It is also the reason why you have to be a NFPA member for at least 6 months before you can vote on code changes at the NFPA meetings.
Don
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top