Steve Merrick
Member
- Location
- Anchorage, AK
I work in Alaska and we use a lot of heat trace up here. NEC 427.55(A) states the heat trace branch circuit breaker, where readily accessible, shall be permitted to be used as the circuit disconnecting means. It also requires, "The disconnecting means... shall be provided with a positive lockout in the "off" position."
A group of our electrical inspectors just came back from a Code class and they are now insisting that branch circuit breakers may *NOT* be used as disconnecting means for heat trace circuits unless the breakers are permanently fitted with the padlock receivers. In other words, standard lockable branch circuit breakers covers are no longer being allowed as lock-out devices for heat trace circuits, when 427.55(A) specifically states they "shall be permitted."
I don't see how a heat trace circuit is different from any other branch circuit disconnecting and energy isolation means. What do you think?
Thanks!
Steve
A group of our electrical inspectors just came back from a Code class and they are now insisting that branch circuit breakers may *NOT* be used as disconnecting means for heat trace circuits unless the breakers are permanently fitted with the padlock receivers. In other words, standard lockable branch circuit breakers covers are no longer being allowed as lock-out devices for heat trace circuits, when 427.55(A) specifically states they "shall be permitted."
I don't see how a heat trace circuit is different from any other branch circuit disconnecting and energy isolation means. What do you think?
Thanks!
Steve