Thanks for this. Do you mean "rare situation where I have more than 320A continuous"?
I think I fall in this situation
That's not what I mean. If your continuous load exceeds 320A, you would need more than a 400A OCPD anyway. You'd then be looking at a service rating of 450A to 600A (most likely 600A, because it is common to round up to more common sizes), for which most utilities would require instrument metering, and self-contained metering. Even for customer-owned metering, you'd likely be using CT's on a circuit that size, instead of self-contained metering. You could get a socket/CT cabinet as a combo device as shown in Post #2, but I still wouldn't consider that self-contained.
The rare situation I meant, is as follows:
1. Your load adds up to between 320A and 400A
2. You would still be using a 400A OCPD. Ordinary OCPD, as opposed to continuous-duty OCPD, for which you need the 125% factor on continuous loads, when sizing it.
3. You would have to have non-continuous loads for this to be a possibility. Either only non-continuous loads, or a mix of both.
4. This would mean that C+NC > 320A, and 1.25*C+NC <= 400A. C = total continuous load, and NC = total non-continuous load.
I've tried to ask Milbank for clarification about this, and couldn't get the rep to understand the question. What I don't understand is why meter socket manufacturers don't simply rate their product according to the corresponding maximum OCPD with which they expect you to use it, and call it a 400A meter socket. This would avoid the ambiguity of the situation I described above, and avoid the possibility of a skeptic to challenge your selection of a 320A meter base used with a 400A breaker.