ATS netural transfer

Status
Not open for further replies.

QES

Senior Member
Location
California
What is the benefit of having a ATS transfering the netural?
Beside NEC requirement of a separate derive system.
 
It is a design issue, with a 4-pole ATS in a 3-phase 4-wire system you bond the neutral at the main service and at the generator. With a 3-pole ATS in the same distribution system you would only bond at the service.

A GFP would operate fine with either system assuming you keep the downstream neutrals free of all ground connections.

Many times when investigating grounding issues we find the neutral bonded at the generator with a 3-pole ATS in a 3-phase 4-wire system and not bonded with a 4-pole ATS.
 
brian john said:
A GFP would operate fine with either system assuming you keep the downstream neutrals free of all ground connections

Not sure of that, I have seen some diagrams showing how even wired properly the GFP can be tripped with the use of a solid neutral switch.
 
I think it may be because the source voltage is not coming through the ground fault CT, but a fault on the generator supplied load would falsely trip the ground fault main if it is still energized, such as exercising under load. "isolating" the neutral would put the fault behind the CT, instead of through it, so the main would not see the fault of the other system, at least until the transfer :-? back to normal. :-?
 
QES said:
What is the benefit of having a ATS transfering the netural?
Beside NEC requirement of a separate derive system.

Well, let's think about it.

Does the neutral carry current?

If unswitched, how would the respective circuit be completed?

(There are a host of other comments that point to the need, but I think the above is the basic issue.)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top