shespuzzling
Member
- Location
- new york
I have a question about ATS semantics. In an ATS, I thought the nubmer of poles indicated the number of switching conductors. So if the neutral was unswitched, it would be a 3-pole ATS, just like in circuit breakers. A 4-pole ATS implies a switching neutral, which can be overlapping or not. Based on this definition, I don't see why one would indicate a 3-pole ATS with an "overlapping neutral", because the neutral is ALWAYS overlapping. I have read various white papers and seen submittals that indicate an ATS as 3-pole and, specifically, with an overlapping neutral. Can you have a 3-pole without an overlapping neutral? I don't see how you could and therefore am confused about why it is mentioned at all. It's like saying a 2-pole receptacle with 2 current carrying condcutors....it's already implied in the number of poles.
Any clarification would be appreciated!
Any clarification would be appreciated!