cdcengineer
Senior Member
We've been working with a local hospital to replace some existing ATS units in a 40 year old section of the hospital. These were originally installed as 3-pole switches as the Essential Electrical System was installed as non separately derived based on the grounding methods.
When the hospital completed an addition which more than doubled it's size two years ago, the designing engineer specified 4-pole switches for the new ATS and requested that the contractor alter the Essential Electrical System (ESS = Generator) grounding creating a separately derived system. I wondered at the time what that might do to the many existing 3-pole switches. I thought ground loops might be created where objectionable current might cause problems. No problems were noted by the staff.
Anyway, now that they are replacing some of the existing 3-pole switches with 4-pole, I wondered why code would not require that all the 3-pole ATS be replaced when the grounding of the ESS?
Does anyone have any personal experience with situations such as these? Any input is greatly appreciated.
When the hospital completed an addition which more than doubled it's size two years ago, the designing engineer specified 4-pole switches for the new ATS and requested that the contractor alter the Essential Electrical System (ESS = Generator) grounding creating a separately derived system. I wondered at the time what that might do to the many existing 3-pole switches. I thought ground loops might be created where objectionable current might cause problems. No problems were noted by the staff.
Anyway, now that they are replacing some of the existing 3-pole switches with 4-pole, I wondered why code would not require that all the 3-pole ATS be replaced when the grounding of the ESS?
Does anyone have any personal experience with situations such as these? Any input is greatly appreciated.