Dont you just hate it when you throw away a post through operator error rather than submitting it!
Please keep us posted on how this works out.
My interest stems from once working in a building that had 3 x 300KVA cogens, whcih very nicely heated the building and reduced the power bills. They were also part of the standby power scheme, along with 2 x 2MVA diesels.
The problem is the cogens couldn't black start, or continue to deliver power in the absence of a prime source. So, when the utility dropped, the cogens, if running, stopped. The diesels started, synced up, and supplied the main bus. The cogens would then start, and connect to the main bus. When the whole lot was running, the ACB between the main bus and the essential bus would close.
That was the theory.
The twice it was needed I was there it failed to work both times. The cooling water pumps were supplied from the main bus, so until everythiung was up and running there was no cooling water. Turns out it took so long to sync that lot up the diesels overheated, and automatically shut down. So the cogens shut down. And so no standby power was ever delivered...
The switchgear necessary for this system was based on three busbars with ACBs between, a supply busbar from the utility transformers, a main busbar, to which the gensets were connected, and an essenial busbar, which fed the building. Normally the ACBs between utility and main, and main and essential were closed. When power ws lost, both opened, and the supply ACB stayed open, and the essential one closed when the gens were ready to take ther strain. Note that in this scheme there was not only an ionterruption going to standby power, but interruption going back to utility power too.
Very much like one half of MIT electrical system:
But without the left / right split busbars, no current limit reactors, and no transformers, Bus G and Bus A being the same bus, and the diesels straight onto Bus A, for full operation.