backfeed warning sign

Status
Not open for further replies.

mjmike

Senior Member
Does anyone know if the NEC has verbiage for a warning sign for a switchboard that is backfed similarly to the verbiage it has for a disconnect switch? This is for a project where power is generated onsite and fed directly into the switchboard. The main breaker won't de-energize the bus, it just de-energizes the downstream panel. I believe the switchboard will still be service entrance rated because the G-N are bonded at the switchboard.
 
Does anyone know if the NEC has verbiage for a warning sign for a switchboard that is backfed similarly to the verbiage it has for a disconnect switch? This is for a project where power is generated onsite and fed directly into the switchboard. The main breaker won't de-energize the bus, it just de-energizes the downstream panel. I believe the switchboard will still be service entrance rated because the G-N are bonded at the switchboard.
I call your description a "Main lugs" unit instead of a main breaker/main switch unit.

You could have up to six such disconnects in this unit and still call it one service.
 
I call your description a "Main lugs" unit instead of a main breaker/main switch unit.

You could have up to six such disconnects in this unit and still call it one service.

Not following you on this? It isn't a service, no utility, so the 6-disconnect rule is not applicable.
 
Not following you on this? It isn't a service, no utility, so the 6-disconnect rule is not applicable.
Maybe I didn't quite follow what you have either, but I understand you do have something already designated as a main switch or breaker, yet it isn't exactly serving as the main. You have to either be supplying this via main lugs or a switch/breaker that is not the one marked as the main.

Six disconnect rule applies to buildings supplied by a feeder as well as a service.
 
If I understand your post, it does not seem like you are back feeding anything.

Is your breaker for a feeder that feeds another main lug panel?
 
If I understand your post, it does not seem like you are back feeding anything.

Is your breaker for a feeder that feeds another main lug panel?

The main breaker in the switchboard will serve the feeder leaving the switchboard. The switchboard branch breakers (6 of them) will put power onto the switchboard bus from the onsite power source.
 
The main breaker in the switchboard will serve the feeder leaving the switchboard. The switchboard branch breakers (6 of them) will put power onto the switchboard bus from the onsite power source.

So basically both the main breaker and the branch breakers in the switchboard are carrying power in the opposite to normal direction?
The same setup that you would see in a PV system AC combiner panel?
Are all of the breakers involved suitable for backfeed (no line/load markings), and are the branch breakers additionally retained if appropriate?
 
... power is generated onsite and fed directly into the switchboard. The main breaker won't de-energize the bus, it just de-energizes the downstream panel. I believe the switchboard will still be service entrance rated because the G-N are bonded at the switchboard.

Not following you on this? It isn't a service, no utility, so the 6-disconnect rule is not applicable.

The main breaker in the switchboard will serve the feeder leaving the switchboard. The switchboard branch breakers (6 of them) will put power onto the switchboard bus from the onsite power source.

So basically both the main breaker and the branch breakers in the switchboard are carrying power in the opposite to normal direction?
...

That is correct.

mj -
A couple of questions:

Any chance you could post a one-line?

How many and what size gens are we discussing?

The Switchboard contains CBs for 6 incomming gens and one output CB to another switchboard (or maybe an MCC) that powers all loads?

edit to make q's a bit clearer (hopefully)

ice
 
Last edited:
Just curious as to how one keeps 6 generators in phase.

Maybe I should know this, but I don't. Except in a power plant, I have never seen generators in parallel.
Don't some gennies make DC and use an inverter to interconnect?
 

Now how about a one-line giving some gen sizes, bus capacities, CB sizes? - Just so we know the magnitude.

A pencil sketch will be fine. No need to be accurate. Just state approximates sizes - not design.

ice
 
Just curious as to how one keeps 6 generators in phase. ...QUOTE]

I've only seen a few. All were small machines - ~500KVA. The biggest issue is responding to large load swings. It is not economical to keep 5 gens running an 15% load (and one off-line for standby/maintenance) when all one needs is 1 at 80%. Of course, starting a large load requires waiting for a gen to auto-start, sync and parallel

Requires:
Controls for auto start, sync on load demand
Load-share/var-share equipment.

The controls are not simple

unless -

The load is near constant - the load swings must be less than say 70% of one gen. Results in n-2 (or less) at baseload, and one in isoc, one (or more) off-line - standby/repair. These controls are a lot simpler

ice
 
I've only seen a few. All were small machines - ~500KVA.

I guess that depends on your definition of small. Something tells me anything smaller then maybe 100 KVA (maybe even more then that) is not worth the cost of what is necessary to keep them all in phase vs purchasing a larger generator that can handle the load.
 
I guess that depends on your definition of small. Something tells me anything smaller then maybe 100 KVA (maybe even more then that) is not worth the cost of what is necessary to keep them all in phase vs purchasing a larger generator that can handle the load.

Yes, for this kind of stuff, 500kva is about as small as I have seen in more than 3 parallel. I've only seen one 6 - parallel (750kva asI recall). I never had to work on it.

I suspect (that means I have not ever had to figure it out - nor seen any paper) that the most economical is to size the generation at n+1 to account for maintenance issues. If one had 2000kva load (4 - 500s) then the ideal might well be 3 each 1000kva sets.

They are easy to keep in phase. Once the gens are synced and on-line, it is hard to get them out of phase. The hard part is keeping the load-share, var-share, auto-start operating reliability. There gets to be enough parts, that MTBF starts creeping toward zero.

I've told you more than I know - time to stop.

ice
 
Does anyone know if the NEC has verbiage for a warning sign for a switchboard that is backfed similarly to the verbiage it has for a disconnect switch? ....

(edit to add) Six generators with cooresponding paralleling gear, load share, var share, auto start, ...., is really complex. It definitely requires qualified personnel to operate.

With the information we have, and no knowledge of what is driving the question: The best I can tell you is, I've never seen any multiple gen system having backfeed warning labels on the common bus switchgear. (edit to add) Having such a label won't make it any safer, nor lessen the requirements for qualified operators.

That answer could change if we ever hear the rest of the story.

ice
 
Last edited:
That was going to be my next question.

I was working on a new gas turbine plant that had 5 generators. 4 gas turbines and one HRSG. I was pretty much in idle mode one day and I asked one of the engineers how it was done.

The turbines are starter / generators. The generators start turning using power from the grid, which gets them spinning in phase. Once up to a certain speed, the turbines are lit and start taking over as the grid power is throttled back. This goes on until the turbine is up to speed. All this is monitored in a control room on multiple large screens. It took at least two people 24/7 to watch what was going on and to push the right buttons when wrong things happened.

That's why I asked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top