the problem with not using the correct terminology is that there are different rules for services, feeders, branch circuits, and SDS. They are all similar, but they also have their differences.
service conductors are the conductors coming in from the utility. they stop being service conductors at the service disconnect. it is not impossible for a control panel to be service equipment, but it is uncommon.
I think you mix up concepts between European electrical systems and US electrical systems. it is all electricity so there are a lot of similarities but there are also a lot of differences.
I suspect you are looking for the mythical way to create a universal design to be used every where. at present, there just is no way to do that. the rules are different enough that you can't and should not even try. you can often use the same components though.
what you referred to as a service disconnect probably is not service equipment at all. it is just a disconnect. the circuit is either a feeder or a branch circuit.
equipment grounding conductors associated with either a feeder or a branch circuit are sized according to the rating of the over current protection device protecting that circuit.
the transformer in your equipment is a separately derived system. there is a set of rules to follow for them.
there is no rule requiring exposed conductive parts be bonded with a conductor at all. Just that they be effectively bonded. They can be screwed together and that is generally considered effective.