Bonding in service disconnects and

[josiahcarlson]

Why do we install a main bonding jumper in each service disconnect 250.24(C) and bond in the ct/meter socket? Wouldn't this create the possibility of objectional current on any metallic raceway between the disconnect and the ct/meter enclosure and also between each disconnect if there are multiple service disconnects.
This seems like it would go against everything we practice anywhere else in an electrical system.


Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

 

[roger]

Yes there can be currents on metallic raceways, whether they are considered objectionable is how we look at it. We have to install a MBJ in the service gear for OCPD operation under a fault. The bonding on the line side of the service gear is not covered under the NEC

 

[infinity]

Service raceways are permitted to be metallic and as long as they are there will be objectionable current. This is one of the few places in the NEC where it is permitted.

 

[david]

Why do we install a main bonding jumper in each service disconnect 250.24(C) and bond in the ct/meter socket? Wouldn't this create the possibility of objectional current on any metallic raceway between the disconnect and the ct/meter enclosure and also between each disconnect if there are multiple service disconnects.
This seems like it would go against everything we practice anywhere else in an electrical system.


Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

You could chose the option of using PVC between the CT cabinet and the service disconnect. But that's not what your asking about

A lot of CT cabinets are not bonded by the manufacturer in that case you could bring a main bonding jumper back from the neutral in the service disconnect.

That may be an option to look at

 

[josiahcarlson]

My question really should have been:
Why do we allow the conduit to be in a parallel path to the neutral conductor between the service disconnects and the ct/meter socket?

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

 

[infinity]

My question really should have been:
Why do we allow the conduit to be in a parallel path to the neutral conductor between the service disconnects and the ct/meter socket?

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

Because we allow metallic service raceways.

 

[Dennis Alwon]

My question really should have been:
Why do we allow the conduit to be in a parallel path to the neutral conductor between the service disconnects and the ct/meter socket?

Sent from my SM-S911U using Tapatalk

I always wondered why also. It seems we want to avoid objectionable current but then allow this. Obviously, it must not be too objectionable. hahaha