Hi,
I have some theory questions regarding breaker functionality. We do a lot of breaker coordination studies which attempt to isolate faults. Most of the time we are only considering phase to phase faults, because breakers downstream of the main substations are generally thermal magnetic and do not have ground fault options. Here are my questions:
1. If ground faults are the most common occurrence, why do we focus more on phase to phase fault coordination when designing TCC curves downstream of substations and boards less than 1000A?
2. If a phase to ground fault were to occur at a lighting and appliance panelboard downstream, no breakers would trip except the main that has ground fault protection. Essentially, your system is NOT coordinated. How is this acceptable?
3. Hypothetically, lets say you didn't have ground fault in your upstream main breaker or anywhere in the system. Lets say you have a ground fault downstream somewhere. The fault flows up the equipment ground conductor all the way to the source transformer, then comes back down the phase conductor to complete the circuit. Wouldn't the breakers still trip even without ground fault settings? Because you still have a large amount of current flowing on one phase, which should cause the breaker to trip. My thinking is that the current wouldn't be large enough to trip the breakers on instantaneous, which is why you have ground fault detection in the first place to detect the lower current levels. Is this correct?
4. Building on item 3 above, when you have a phase to phase fault, the breaker directly upstream of the fault senses a large current and therefore trips immediately on instantaneous. This is a coordinate system because it trips faster than the breaker upstream. Is the difference between phase to phase and phase to ground just the amount of current that flows? Therefore, you need ground fault detection separately versus just having regular phase detection?
I have some theory questions regarding breaker functionality. We do a lot of breaker coordination studies which attempt to isolate faults. Most of the time we are only considering phase to phase faults, because breakers downstream of the main substations are generally thermal magnetic and do not have ground fault options. Here are my questions:
1. If ground faults are the most common occurrence, why do we focus more on phase to phase fault coordination when designing TCC curves downstream of substations and boards less than 1000A?
2. If a phase to ground fault were to occur at a lighting and appliance panelboard downstream, no breakers would trip except the main that has ground fault protection. Essentially, your system is NOT coordinated. How is this acceptable?
3. Hypothetically, lets say you didn't have ground fault in your upstream main breaker or anywhere in the system. Lets say you have a ground fault downstream somewhere. The fault flows up the equipment ground conductor all the way to the source transformer, then comes back down the phase conductor to complete the circuit. Wouldn't the breakers still trip even without ground fault settings? Because you still have a large amount of current flowing on one phase, which should cause the breaker to trip. My thinking is that the current wouldn't be large enough to trip the breakers on instantaneous, which is why you have ground fault detection in the first place to detect the lower current levels. Is this correct?
4. Building on item 3 above, when you have a phase to phase fault, the breaker directly upstream of the fault senses a large current and therefore trips immediately on instantaneous. This is a coordinate system because it trips faster than the breaker upstream. Is the difference between phase to phase and phase to ground just the amount of current that flows? Therefore, you need ground fault detection separately versus just having regular phase detection?