breaker placement

Merry Christmas
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: breaker placement

No, and it doesn't make any difference whatsoever where they are placed in the panel. I like to place them at the top myself simply for aesthetics, but it has no impact on performance.
 
Re: breaker placement

I put them where they'll fit. I just installed a MLO subpanel on Friday, and I wound up putting the 100A breaker in the main panel in the middle of the pack because that's where there were two open slots that resulted from some demo that was done as part of a kitchen remodel.

[ December 11, 2005, 09:30 PM: Message edited by: jeff43222 ]
 
Re: breaker placement

I believe a better choice is at the top near the main lugs or breaker.Heat rises and also why have high current going all the way thru the bus bars to reach a 100.But nec does not say you cant and if its an add on i would use the space available.
 
Re: breaker placement

I prefer placing all of the 2-pole breakers on one side, and the single-poles on the other. Often, there is only one neutral bar, and that is the side I place the single-poles on.

Many panels have a stated current-limit per stab, often 100 or 125 amps, so you shouldn't put the largest 2-poles opposing each other, which is another reason I do it this way.
 
Re: breaker placement

Originally posted by LarryFine:
Many panels have a stated current-limit per stab, often 100 or 125 amps, so you shouldn't put the largest 2-poles opposing each other, which is another reason I do it this way.
I've heard this several times before, but I've never seen a panel so marked. Can someone clue me in on what brands or models these might be, so I don't do something bad down the road?
 
Re: breaker placement

I have seen panels that limit the size of any one breaker installed on the busbars, but I never saw any limit "per stab" writtin as such that I can recall. Larry is probably right, and I was probably reading it just fast enough to see only the part of the breaker limitation, but I still don't recall any "stab" limitation.
 
Re: breaker placement

A while ago, i researched the 'load per position/breaker'. Some panels rated the top section at "X" amps per and the bottom at a lesser amp load. I wish i still had the literature..very interesting.
 
Re: breaker placement

Most panelboard manufacturers limit the size of the breakers that can be mounted adjacent to one another. For example, for a GE AD plus series board they say:
220A double branch maximum (100/120A, 90/130A, etc.).
I'm sure that SQR-D and Siemens are similar. Granted I don't work with residential stuff much, but I would think that there are similar restrictions.

Also, SQR-D says that "unless otherwise specified", the larger breakers will be arranged closer to the mains.
 
Re: breaker placement

The only limitation I have seen is where the main breaker is placed on either 1,3 or 2,4 and you cant put a breaker on the opposite side. Old panels that use a split bus system may have limitaions on certain branch's but that is all that I have seen.
 
Re: breaker placement

I try to keep some air around afci`s (they do get hotter) and after that grab your leads and run with it,Have never had a problem with 2poles side by side or opposing phases
 
Re: breaker placement

Originally posted by allenwayne:
Have never had a problem with 2poles side by side or opposing phases
I have: I got a nice zap from a 50a range breaker mounted opposite a 60a electric-heat breaker, and the contacts of one pole of the range breaker welded closed.

By the way, my call was to replace the range cord and receptacle because of the fire from the receptacle. Needless to say, I rearranged the breakers when I replaced them.


The most recent time I saw the shared-stab limitation is in the Homeline 200a ML panels in a 7500+ sq.ft. house. I checked because I ran a 90a sub-panel from each panel, using #2 al.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top