In a C1D2 area, we typically use NEMA4X junction boxes because they only contain terminal blocks. In these enclosures, we use NEMA4X breather/drains (no need for C1D2 rated breather/drains).
However, we always use C1D2 rated conduit breather/drains (i.e. Crouse-Hinds ECD 16/18). I've asked Crouse-Hinds if these breather/drains (or just conduit drains) could be of the non-hazardous type - really because alot of the conduit fittings (i.e. LB37) are not rated. Crouse-Hinds replied that hazardous drains were required.
Why would I have to be required to use a C1D2 rated drain in conduit if some of the conduit fittings themselves are not rated (i.e LB37)? If there is an explosion, it sure is going to blow the screw on cover of the LB37 well before it gets to the C1D2 drain.
Also, when CSA comes to inspect our skids for CSA C1D2 compliance (and apply a C1D2 overall cert for it), they do not even look at the breather/drains on the junction boxes or the drains in the conduit runs for their ratings.
Thanks for any help
However, we always use C1D2 rated conduit breather/drains (i.e. Crouse-Hinds ECD 16/18). I've asked Crouse-Hinds if these breather/drains (or just conduit drains) could be of the non-hazardous type - really because alot of the conduit fittings (i.e. LB37) are not rated. Crouse-Hinds replied that hazardous drains were required.
Why would I have to be required to use a C1D2 rated drain in conduit if some of the conduit fittings themselves are not rated (i.e LB37)? If there is an explosion, it sure is going to blow the screw on cover of the LB37 well before it gets to the C1D2 drain.
Also, when CSA comes to inspect our skids for CSA C1D2 compliance (and apply a C1D2 overall cert for it), they do not even look at the breather/drains on the junction boxes or the drains in the conduit runs for their ratings.
Thanks for any help