Stevenfyeager
Senior Member
- Location
- United States, Indiana
- Occupation
- electrical contractor
Under concrete residential driveway, 12" depth required for GFCI protected, 20 amp, correct ? Does this 12" include the 4" of concrete ? Thank you.
Or do I use the second row of 300.5, below concrete, depth of 6 " ?Under concrete residential driveway, 12" depth required for GFCI protected, 20 amp, correct ? Does this 12" include the 4" of concrete ? Thank you.
Under concrete residential driveway, 12" depth required for GFCI protected, 20 amp, correct ? Does this 12" include the 4" of concrete ? Thank you.
I think it is from surface of driveway, but it really doesn't say either.Or do I use the second row of 300.5, below concrete, depth of 6 " ?
Thanks, but the second row in 2017 NEC I was looking at just says below (2”) concrete It doesn’t say anything about traffic. 6” Am I wrong to use this row ?I think it is from surface of driveway, but it really doesn't say either.
second row is for "other than driveway" slabs, no vehicular traffic.
Except it doesn't say that. Nothing specifies how to handle the situation that more than one row applies, whether to take the lesser or greater depth. If the second row also included the "not specified below" language, then it would avoid that ambiguity.second row is for "other than driveway" slabs, no vehicular traffic.
Yes, but if the driveway is made of concrete, then the Line 2 description also covers the installation.Table 300.5, Column 4, Line 6, very specifically covers this case. "One- and two-family dwelling driveway."
I agree. A concrete driveway changes nothing.Table 300.5, Column 4, Line 6, very specifically covers this case. "One- and two-family dwelling driveway...residential branch circuits rated 120V or less...GFCI protection...max OCPD 20A...12 inches". The concrete thickness is part of the required cover (see Note 1).
Other than introducing ambiguity as to which row applies. Although the choosing the greater depth is obviously conservative.I agree. A concrete driveway changes nothing.
Other than introducing ambiguity as to which row applies. Although the choosing the greater depth is obviously conservative.
Cheers, Wayne
I don't see any ambiguity either. It's under a driveway and a one or two family dwelling so that's the line that applies.One might think that a suggestion to remove the ambiguity is in order. But the CMP would probably claim there is no ambiguity.
But it's under 2" of concrete, so that's the line that applies.I don't see any ambiguity either. It's under a driveway and a one or two family dwelling so that's the line that applies.
how do you know the concrete driveway is 2" thick?But it's under 2" of concrete, so that's the line that applies.
Wayne
Obviously an assumption, but it's going to be true for 99.9% of concrete slabs on grade. I guess if you had a perfectly compacted stable subbase with no moisture related movement of any kind, you might be able to drive on a 1-1/2" thick slab and it would hold up. But even most sidewalks are at least 2".how do you know the concrete driveway is 2" thick?
I don't ascribe any content to those words. I don't believe it is attempting to specify the installation method, rather than just the final result.also, how do you know it is in a trench under the driveway.
In trench below 50 mm (2 in.)
thick concrete or equivalent