Cable entry options for switchgear & transformers

Status
Not open for further replies.

iowens

Member
I am trying to figure out what options are available for cable entries into switchgear and transformers on an NEC project.
We will be using both non metalclad 'Tray Cable' and non metalclad MV-90 cable. On a typical IEC project for this application I would use a brass industrial cable gland with metric parallel threads. The switchgear and transformers would have gland plates with suitably sized clearance holes, and the gland would be secured with a locknut.

The project is to be in line with NEC/NEMA standards, and I am having difficulty finding suitable cable glands (sometimes referred to as cable connectors / cord grips ?) or other suitable means of cable entry.

It seems that options include:

(1) 'Cord and cable fittings' type products such as Cooper Crouse Hinds CGB product, although this does not appear to be available in aluminium (for use with single core power cables), neither does it appear to be rated as NEMA 4X for use outdoors in transformer bay location. Appleton manufacture a similar product in Aluminium or steel material but again, it does not appear to meet NEMA 4X, and neither of these manufacturer's show the product with a locknut for cable entry into enclosures with clearance holes.
(2) Killark manufacture a cord connector (model ZS108) which is shown in the catalogue with a locknut. I have concerns about the ability of this arrangement in terms of maintaining integrity of enclosure when using tapered NPT threads. I have been told that with a tapered thread the locknut can become tight on the thread before it has formed a tight seal between the connector and the enclosure.
(3) The final option appears to be to pass the non-armoured cable through an 'insulating bushing' such as o-z gedney type ABB. These do not appear to provide any sort of seal between the cable and the enclosure, so would be unsuitable for cable entry to transformers, and since our switchgear is to be top entry they do not appear to be suitable in terms of ingress protection of the switchgear enclosure.

There seems to be limitations and restrictions with all of the above methods none appears to fully meet our requirements.

I would be grateful for advice as to how cable entry to switchgear and transformers is typically carried out with NEMA equipment and in accordance with NEC standards.
 
Kellems grip for tray cable.
l13a_diagram.jpg


I'd be concerned about running MV-90 style that is not in raceway.
 
Thanks for your responses,

Eric
Can you please advise if Appleton CC cord grips are suitable for MV cable ?

Marc,
The MV-90 cable is to be directly buried for most of the route between layers of sand, so there should be no risk of cable damage from rocky backfill etc. The route will be covered with concrete tiles, and where the cable emerges from grade they will be protected by PVC ducts, and the rest of the route it will be protected on tray. The manufacturers data shows that the cable is UL listed for direct burial and the NEC code merely states that the cable is suitable for direct burial provided the installation is in accordance with 300.50.

I can't find any reference in the code which precludes direct burial. I can only assume that metal-clad is used for direct burial for a "comfort factor". It is not really required, but it has become normal practice.

Cheers
Ian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top